Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Workbee length
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] Mabye 4.11 size refers to the Workbee with the manipulator arms attached? That would be about the right length... After all, the Workbee (as shown) is pretty useless with the arms aor the cargo sled. The DS9TM has it's charm....I think Sternbach got it dumped on him because he was fast with Illustrator (while Eaves' stuff seems to be more traditional sketches than technical illustration) and Jim Martin was replaced with a Founder or something. I like the 4.11 length of the Workbee- it's more of a shuttle and less an obvious deathtrap at that scale. At 2.7 meters, the workbee's hull must be paper thin......fuuuuck that noise. Same for the pictured "shuttlepod"- the [i]worst[/i] design from TNG (well, aside from the laughably lame [i]Exocomps[/i], that is). Better to just be inside a powered EVA suit in that case. B.J., try sliding the pilot forward some, putting him in a EVA suit and (mabye) adding a back seat or equipment locker behind the seat....I think that might work for the larger size... Though something between the 2.7 and 4.11 scales would be ideal. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3