Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Static Galaxy-class spaceframes at UP's surface base?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by HerbShrump: [QB] You keep ships in shipyards. They keep scrap ships at Qualor II, why can't they keep newer ships in shipyards? While the idea of a training facility has merit, I don't think they'd build a training facility like that. Why go through the expense of building both nacelles, for example? It'd also create problems in training exercises if you had to go from the saucer to the engineering hull. It'd make more sense for a training facility to be laid out like a completed Galaxy class, not broken in sections. Or just the key facilities. No need for a training facility to be the exact size with all the crew quarters, etc... of a Galaxy class ship. Of course, holodecks would be a lot more simpler and easier to use for training. They take up less room and can easily be configured or updated for whatever ship you are training on. What did Utopia Planetia look like in "Booby Trap"? Did we get to see outsde any windows on the Holodeck simulation? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3