Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
TNG in HD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by o2: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [qb] As far back as 2002, [b]Spike[/b] [URL=http://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/1964.html#000000]provided[/URL] screenshots that showed the number legibly. (The image links may well be dead by now, though.) Respectfully, I think your second conclusion is misguided. It would both be a distortion of what actually happened (the model was labeled as the [i]Cochrane[/i] and then footage of it was reused as a different ship) and would conflict with the casualty list graphic from DS9 ("In The Pale Moonlight," et al) that again shows NCC-59318 attached to the name [i]U.S.S. Cochrane[/i]. [/qb][/QUOTE]The ship list that is featured in the episode 'In the Pale Moonlight' is not the same that was published in the DS9 companion and that has referenced the Cochrane. There is still no canon source for a ship named 'Cochrane' in any episiode that has aired. But here I'm talking about information that is accessable right now with the TNG-R project. This piece of information has to be favoured over any other kind of information that has only be made available in 'written' form. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3