Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
TNG in HD
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dukhat: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by vwuser: [qb] There weren't many stock shots of the Miranda class starship. I think an Excelsior class would have been better for the Biko. She has the bulk to be a cargo ship. These ships were being used for milk runs.[/qb][/QUOTE]The Lantree was described as a supply ship, just like the Biko was. There's no reason not to assume the stock footage couldn't have done the job in a somewhat better capacity (at least by obscuring the registry). [QUOTE][qb]The impression I get from the Okudagrams is that Starfleet was a much smaller organization in TNG than it appeared to be in DS9. We have starship mission status charts for a wide range of sectors; the number of ships was less than 20. Many of the ships named in dialog are mentioned in these charts. Rarely, do we see a new ship. This continued into DS9 until the Dominion War when Starfleet experienced an inflation. And, we have seen the Enterprise rendezvous with the Hood on several occasions.[/qb][/QUOTE]While it's true what you say about SF seeming to be smaller in TNG, the fact that this isn't borne out later could be considered a retcon. But I'm going with what I saw in DS9. [QUOTE][qb]Lastly, the registry that is seen on the nacelles is NCC-2541, not NCC-2544. [/qb][/QUOTE]Nope, the registry of the Repulse is NCC-2544. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3