Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
Designs: Opinion Poll
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bear: [QB] Kitbashes to me are acceptable if the look and feel of the components is similar. I personally hated the Rigel because it broke this rule. There is something about a ship that contains an engineering section of a constitution, a galaxy saucer and nacelles that I find visibly offensive. My best explanation for this assault on my senses is that Starfleet was attempting to keep the Rigel in service because of some unknown reason. Perhaps if Starfleet had continued the upgrade the constitution engineering section would have been replaced with something more similar to the other components. I much prefer original designs, but from the standpoint of producing ships for a navy, I believe proven components would be use in every possible configuration to achieve a space worthy vessel. This has been proven by ST writer and designers on many occasions, but for some insane reason they care far less about aesthetics than about producing a show�..lol Kitbashes are ok if they are done with some taste! Weapon loading kitbashers should be summarily taken out and executed! Here are some constitution/miranda/constellation reconfigurations to produce specific designs of given class. Note Large pic [URL=http://www.geocities.com:80/Area51/Stargate/9268/variantlist.jpg]http://www.geocities.com:80/Area51/Stargate/9268/variantlist.jpg[/URL] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3