Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
My list of retcons, as promised...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Griffworks: [QB] Jonah, Please don't take this the wrong way, but I agree with pretty much everything that "MMoM" said about it being fairly "arrogant" and all that. Plus, while I agree with basic idea of what you're saying about the blocks of numbers making sense for TOS thru TOS Movie era, than it just getting sort of chaotic afterward. However, I don't agree w/the thinking of the "1600" series of [i]Constitution[/i] class ships ever having been [i]Constitution[/i] class vessels, regardless what Mr. Okuda or Mr. Jein have come up with as a rationale. It just makes no sense! Why would SF do that? On the subject of "re-registering" some of those ships, I [b]can[/b] understand if they were originally "filling in" numbers by going w/the "1600" series and then "back re-registered" them to fit the FJD system - tho why they'd number them w/lower registries in the first place just doesn't compute to me. However, the supposition given for Eagle being given that registry to "honor" the name in this thread makes no sense to me, either. As "Wraith" said, registry systems are meant to keep track of things. Having two vessels w/the exact same registry makes no sense to me, DS9's Defiant in the last couple episodes, not-with-standing.... :rolleyes: While I admire your passion, I just don't think you're doing yourself justice with all this info gathering. You should be building some models, man! ;) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3