Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
Constitution Class - Phase II
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Phoenix: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Griffworks: [qb] Alrighty, then.... The universally accepted form of canon is that which is seen on-screen and ain't got crap to do with "what's intended". After all, you have to have a basic standard for everone to use, and that's what most folks use: what's seen/heard on-screen. Don't like it? Don't deal with anyone else, then.... [/qb][/QUOTE]Just out of curiosity, what do you think of Jeri Taylor's novels and their canonicity? According to startrek.com: [QUOTE]As a rule of thumb, the events that take place within the live action episodes and movies are canon, or official Star Trek facts. Story lines, characters, events, stardates, etc. that take place within the fictional novels, the Animated Adventures, and the various comic lines are not canon. There are a couple of exceptions to this rule: the Jeri Taylor penned novels "Mosaic" and "Pathways." Many of the events in these two novels feature background details of the main Star Trek: Voyager characters. (Note: There are a few details from an episode of the Animated Adventures that have entered into the Star Trek canon. The episode "Yesteryear," written by D.C. Fontana, features some biographical background on Spock.)[/QUOTE]Personally, I consider them canon, as I like the whole Bonestell thing, but it seems that many people don't... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3