Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
My Second Generation Webpage
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MinutiaeMan: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by USS_Delphronta: [i]First, the link is broken[/i] Well it works for me and for everyone else I know! Given that most people I know run windows 98se 2000pro or XPpro.[/QUOTE] :rolleyes: Yes, and that's what EVERYONE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD uses! Looking at your second post with the screenshot of code, the problem is obvious -- you substituted back-slashes ("\") for forward-slashes ("/"). How someone can get confused by the two, I have no idea... unless they paid absolutely no attention to HTML conventions, anyway. [QUOTE]Im not quite sure how you think I violated that terms of use.[/QUOTE]You really are clueless, aren't you? Assuming that your link to StarTrek.com worked, it would have displayed the site in the right frame of your site, while keeping the left frame the same. That creates the appearance and implication that someone else is running/endorsing/controlling StarTrek.com -- that's where the "framed" part comes in. Not to mention that it can seriously disrupt the display of StarTrek.com's pages (which is the rude part). [QUOTE]But it seems to me that your browser is non java/frames compatible.[/QUOTE]Ah, sure. Blame it on the guy who's responding to the criticism [i]that you requested in the first place.[/i] I am using [URL=http://www.apple.com/safari/]Apple Safari[/URL] 1.0 (v85) on Macintosh OS X 10.2.6, with full Java, JavaScript, and Java applet compatability enabled. Safari is one of the most standards-compliant browsers out there today. There's nothing wrong with my browser, thank you very much. Oh, and the last browser that was not compatible with frames was probably distributed back in 1996. :rolleyes: [QUOTE]I think that its about time to up the resolution standards now that monitors can go very high, my monitor puts 640x 480 to shame.[/QUOTE]That's why he recommended a minimum of 800x600 instead, since that's a bit more common, still. [QUOTE]Most people I know have 1280x1024 or better desktop resolutions.[/QUOTE]And I'm sure you know a very diverse section of the entire population of the Internet... like people with bad eyesight? People who're completely blind? People who prefer to use small resolution screens for whatever personal reason? People who can't afford to buy the latest LCD flatscreen monitor that's come out just because it is TEH R0XX0R? [QUOTE]When I browse a page thats designed for 640 by 480 I can barely read the text, the graphics are lame and few from lack of space... is that what we come to expect from the internet?[/QUOTE]That's because most of those pages were designed back in 1998 or so and haven't been changed since. You spend most of your time browsing Geocities, don't you? [QUOTE]The horrible load times are my bad there no other way(other than a preload screeen) to make it better.[/QUOTE]Well gee, maybe you COULD just provide links to your collection of images rather than loading numerous multi-kilobyte images all in the same page... but that would be too simple, wouldn't it? I apologize for the somewhat excessive sarcasm, but one of the few things I can't abide is willful ignorance of web designers. Take a look at my website via the link below -- Star Trek Minutiae. I make no shortcuts on designing an attractive site with clean graphics, but I also make sure that it's flexible and can be displayed at multiple resolutions and sizes. It's NOT that difficult if you take the time to learn! :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3