posted
Remember that M/AR's aren't the only way to power a warp drive.
-------------------- Later, J _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.
posted
No, lithium is an M/AR variant of the kind we are used to. There is the quantum sigularity drive, ala Romulans. There is also the cheap, fusion powered warp drive. Anyway you can get a significant amount of power to the warp field coils so they can create a warp field [including all the specifics about energizing them in order, timing, etc] you'll have a warp drive.
-------------------- Later, J _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.
posted
There is a detail on the sled's underside which could conceivably be a flat swirl M/AM intermix chamber. Although there are almost certainly fusion reactors in the nacelles themselves to power the impulse engines at the rear.
quote:Originally posted by MarianLH: Yes, the warp sled could be old enough to still be using lithium.
Marian
Or the writers were.
-------------------- Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering. -Aeschylus, Agamemnon
Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742
posted
Are the Vulcan vessels from Enterprise M/AM-powered? If so, why exactly do they use these ring nacelles? If they found a more efficient way to power a starship (for example putting their version of the warp core into the ring itself to reduce the power loss when using the EPS conduit to transfer the energy from the reaction chamber to the nacelle, something like that) it's hard to imagine they would not use that technology a century later, too. So the core-inside-the-nacelle-theory could be absolutely plausible.
-------------------- "This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."
Registered: Nov 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Then again, TNG-era Vulcan ships do use ring engines. That is, assuming that the ships seen in "Unification" and "For the Cause" were truly TNG-era vessels and not centuries- or millennia-old relics.
Perhaps the Vulcan shuttle from TMP was Made In Earth, and thus used nacelles? That would fit with the pod having a docking system that is compatible with an Earth starship, whereas such commonality is exceedingly rare anywhere else in Trek.
The ENT-era shuttles seem to use rings or partial rings, so the reason for the nacelles cannot lie in problems with scaling down the ring technology to shuttlecraft size.
posted
It's referred to as a Warp Sled, but I always took it to be starndard Federation/Starfleet equipment and not limited to just Vulcan or Vulcan technology.
My reasoning behind this is the shuttle is the same design as the shuttle seen in the bay of the Enterprise .
So the sled is Starfleet/Federation or at least compatible with their modular designs.
In the real world we know the designers from ST:TMP weren't concerned with warp cores, etc... These concepts probably hadn't been fully fleshed out (yes, we saw the core on the Enterprise, but how much thought was put into it with regards the rest of the fleet?).
Struck me as interesting when contrasting the Warp Sled with the Runabouts, warp shuttles and Delta Flyer types from 100 years or so later.
Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
The shuttle seems to be originally designed as a 'new' Starfleet shuttle, before some guy decided it was a purely Vulcan thing.
The docking ring is obviously compatible with Starfleet standards. What good would a shuttle be if you can't interface with the Starfleet family? That's illogical, captain!
And why would Vulcans be restricted to warp-rings? They have an entire Federation full of contractors and shipyards at their fingertips.
posted
Someone mentioned different methods of warp travel. At the time of TOS/TMP, none of the various methods had been mentioned. Now, does that mean they hadn't been invented/discovered yet or simply that in 3 seasons and 1 movie we weren't given enough time to explore other methods that already existed in the 23rd century?
Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
Another possibility is that the shuttle has two different Matter/Antimatter reactors, one in each nacelle. Just cause some ships have one engine code doesn't mean they all have to.
-------------------- "Well, I mean, it's generally understood that, of all of the people in the world, Mike Nelson is the best." -- ULTRA MAGNUS, steadfast in curmudgeon
Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
I don't know if this makes a difference on weather the sled is Starfleet or just Vulcan, but
'and then, wanting to suggest a Vulcan design influence, changed the engines' cross-section to the shape of the ceremonial gong that was seen on Vulcan in the original series episode: "Amok Time".' (From Probert's website)
Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
...Later to be known as Ronthorntonagon, and overutilized in visual science fiction throughout the eighties and nineties.
There's something of a "pointed ear" motif to those spiky nacelles, too. Whether wholly intentional or not, the design does look "alien" overall, both in the Trek context (it looks like a close relative of the Klingon cruisers!) and in more general scifi terms.
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
