Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
What's non-canon about Star Trek VI?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bernd: [QB] kmart: Very interesting. That's the first time I get an idea of GR's objections to ST VI (other than a general "it destroys his vision"). And about canonicity of ST V/VI vs. TAS. While the Encyclopedia as such cannot be *the canon*, it represents canon. I mean, the Okudas wouldn't write this very thick and usually very reliable book, include all kinds of references, only to add user notes, which mark TAS as non-canon and certain events of ST V/VI too. The second edition corrected some errors (namely introduction of selected non-canon facts) made in the Encyclopedia I and the Chronology, so the motivation and goal is clear. This would make the two movies bascially canon, but I have no problem to disrespect a few troublesome facts, like I don't have the problem with "Spock's Brain" or "Threshold" either. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3