Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Enterprise vs. Continuity?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ryan McReynolds: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by CaptainMike: [qb]Yeah.. the normal kids would beat up the whole lot of us.. we need to stick together[/qb][/QUOTE] Haha, right on! For what it's worth, I truly apologize if you thought I was being pissy: I wasn't. Honestly, I was responding to what you said, nothing more, and nothing less. Your post gave no indication that you knew of the "centuries ago" line at all; I assumed you didn't. I also didn't consider the possibility that people would use "centuries" to refer to periods of time less than 200 years. To tell you the truth, I was in a [i]great[/i] mood until I read your reply to my reply to your reply. So again, sorry if it came across wrong. As to the purpose of the thread, it's simple: if somebody makes the assertion that [i]Enterprise[/i] violates continuity, the onus of proof is on them to support that assertion. I have yet to see anyone do so. There are plenty of things about [i]Enterprise[/i] that I don't like, from the theme song to that decon scene to the overuse of "plasma" technology to Kronos being four days away... but none of that is particularly inconsistent, it's just personal preference. I don't have any intention of "tearing apart" anyone unless the definition of "tearing apart" includes "responding." :D And I certainly won't claim that the "new show is perfect," because it's not. So, really, this thread was supposed to be simple, clean, and relatively boring... no hard feelings here. Hopefully sombody with continuity issues will share them. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3