Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » 'Enterprise' Concept Confirmed. (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5   
Author Topic: 'Enterprise' Concept Confirmed.
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Please let it be NCV-1701...
http://www.trekweb.com has the story

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You don't read around this forum much, do you?

------------------
"I said 'You are, you are,
The only one who sees.'
I said, 'You are, you are'
The only strength I need.'"
---Kim Leaman, "Mary"


Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You are right. I should read the damn boards before posting, I always make an ass out of myself. Anyway, doesnt NCV-1701 sound nicer then a prequel?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The registry won't be "1701"

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
Card-Carrying Member of the Flare APAO
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.


Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
source? If it was to take place in the 29the century, (when NCV- regestries take place) wouldnt it make sence for the first timeship enterprise to be NCV-1701?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Where have you been?? It's already official and anounced by Paramount. It's called 'Enterprise', and it is set in the 22th century...

------------------
"We have a good arrangement. He supplies the weapons, I use them."
- Blade


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MIB
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Altair, Read and weep:

Paramount has finally made it official in a press release from Paramount Network Television: the next 'Star Trek' series will titled 'Enterprise'. The show will star actor Scott Bakula as 'Captain Jonathan (not Jackson, as previously believed) Archer', "a physical and intensely curious captain with a bold personality." Interestingly, this limited press release DOES NOT confirm that the series' premise is, in fact, a prequel; however, if these long-speculated rumors are true, you can bet the rest of it is unless there's a huge curve ball coming.

That was from http://talk.trekweb.com/articles/2001/05/10/989546996.html As you can see. Paramount DID NOT say it was going to be a prequil series.

As for a NCV registry, that's a 29th centrey registry number prefix for Federation time ships. HEY! I had a thought! What if the rumor about Series V being a prequil series IS true. Sort of. What I mean is that if the NCV-1701 Enterprise is indeed a timeship, (With a registry starting with NCV it SHOULD be a time ship) maybe the pilot and a few episodes afterwards takes place before the birth of the federation. Not the entire series. Are you following what I'm saying? Like the pilot starts out with the U.S.S. Enterprise going back in time to investigate a mystery that baffeled the Federation for centeries and while they were doing that, they botch up the time line big time!

I also have a thought for what the U.S.S. would mean on a federation time ship. How about the United Space-Time Ship (fill in blank). It would make perfect sense because the ship travels through both space AND time......


------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca

[This message has been edited by MIB (edited May 11, 2001).]


IP: Logged
Michael Dracon
aka: NightWing or Altair
Member # 4

 - posted      Profile for Michael Dracon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Uhm, not to be rude or anything, but Lolita Fatjo confirmed the 22th century setting.

BUT: I'm won't be surprised if it turns out to be an elaborate scheme to mis-inform the audience. I certainly hope so. I'm not a big fan of the prequel idea, but I will however give such a series a chance.

------------------
"We have a good arrangement. He supplies the weapons, I use them."
- Blade


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MIB
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree with you Altair. I'm not a fan of the prequil series idea either. I really hope that the whole prequil thing is a ruse.

------------------
"We have to get drunk immediately."----Gattaca


IP: Logged
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Who the hell is Lolita Fatjo? Paramound press spokesperson?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wes
Over 20 years here? Holy cow.
Member # 212

 - posted      Profile for Wes     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
oh... pre-production coordinator?

------------------
Wes Button[email protected]
TechFX StudiosThe United Federation Uplink
------------------
I don't like Wesley Crusher.


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Teelie
Senior Member
Member # 280

 - posted      Profile for Teelie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Although she did come out with claiming to be misquoted on Scott Bakula being the Captain so her being misquoted on the date wouldn't be surprising either.

------------------


Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
The_Tom
recently silent
Member # 38

 - posted      Profile for The_Tom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So let's see... the leaked casting sheet had almost the exact name of the captain on it correctly, 5 male roles (one a black male) and 2 female roles (one an asian female), but the premise on it is wrong?

Let's swing this back towards the Starships topic.

Leaving the specific technologies we're gonna find in the 22nd century aside for a second, what kind of ship do you guys think this "Enterprise" likely to be. Big? Small? A "flagship"? Old? New?

------------------
"And as it is, it is cheaper than drinking."
-DT on arguing with Omega, April 30


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Something very good looking and cool but that always gets its ass kicked before suddenly winning the battle in the end of the episode, like all Trek ships before it.

-Torpedoes, captain?
-No, transfer aux. power to holosuite!! They won't anticipate that, hahaah!
-Torpedoes now, captain?
-No, we could kill them with that. Prepare to start prepearing a pseudo-evasive manouver!
-Aw sod it, I'll do it myself! *boom*
-Huh, we won. But you'll go to the brig for that, young lady. Young boy, escort her to the brig. Young security officer will know what to do with her.
-Fine, whatever, as long as we're alive.

------------------
Don't kill me, I'm charming!

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited May 12, 2001).]


Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The 'new' Enterprise?

No phasers (back to the kitschy lasers!)
No holodecks
No replicators
No Starfleet logos
No "USS" or "NCC"
No "1701"
No Warp 7,8 or 9
No arrowhead-communicators
No LCARS
No glowy things, except for the 'Buzzard' ramscoops

Hopefully, they'll adhere to Jefferies philosophy: "Keep the important stuff inside".
But since Eaves seems to like to show of hardware, this is unlikely. Thank god we still have Okuda to give us sets and a decent computer interface.

------------------
"Fuck L Ron Hubbard and fuck all his clones.
Fuck all those gun-toting
hip gangster wannabes."
-Tool, Ænima

---
Titan Fleet Yards - Harry Doddema's Star Trek Site


Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 5 pages: 1  2  3  4  5   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3