Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » TNG:TM reference to odd nacelled starships (Page 3)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: TNG:TM reference to odd nacelled starships
Identity Crisis
Defender of the Non-Canon
Member # 67

 - posted      Profile for Identity Crisis     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, it may not be very simple.

Pumping equal amounts of plasma into two nacelles vs three nacelles may produce very different warp field configurations. So depending on what you want to do three nacelles may be better or worse than two nacelles at the same power.

Clearly the evidence says that for general purpose usage two nacelles is best, but for specialised purposes, one, three or four may be better. However, we've never seen five or more (the Prometheus doesn't count as it only uses four out of the six as single ship) so the cons presumably outwiegh the pros at numbers greater than four.

Personally I tend to subscribe to a similar view to that given in ealier posts by several people. Three nacelles gives extra warp-speed manoeuvrability (and possible also ac/deceleration) but makes little difference to top speed.

--------------------
"My theories appal you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters and you don't like my tie." - The Doctor

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PsyLiam:
quote:
Originally posted by Jason Abbadon:

Some FASA designs are canon ad they appear onscreen as data searches the computer files during Contagen.

Don't be silly. They are no more canon than the idea that a parrot is commander in chief of Starfleet.
Actually, it was the episode Conspiracy.
So, if Data was'nt viewing "canon" starships on his computer screens, he was looking at an old obscure spaceship-roleplaying game instead of following Picard's orders?
What a slacker, that Data is. [Wink]

Onscreen means Canon...for better or worse.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Onscreen means Canon...for better or worse.
No, onscreen means "canon except in unreasonable or unexplainable circumstances," Need I mention "Threshold"? [Razz]

Or would you also like to say that the Enterprise-D was destroyed by the Dominion in "The Jem'Hadar" and also was part of the big fleet at the end of "Call to Arms"? There are so many things you just have to make allowances for. Canon can't be taken by its strict definition -- it's got to be interpreted.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yah, I know, but even if you dont accepy those two FASA designs as starfleet ships, they are cool enough to be canon in my book.

Just as "Threshold" and most of TNG's sevent season are some fever induced dreams.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
SoundEffect
Active Member
Member # 926

 - posted      Profile for SoundEffect     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Or would you also like to say that the Enterprise-D was destroyed by the Dominion in "The Jem'Hadar"
Are you referring to the unreadable hull while docked at the station, or the completely relabeled and readable USS Odyssey NCC-71832 during battle scenes?

--------------------
Stephen L.
-Maritime Science Fiction Modelers-

Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3