Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Deep Space Nine's mass? (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Deep Space Nine's mass?
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Quick reference question here -- have we ever been given a hint about how massive DS9 is? I took a quick scan through the likely pages of the DS9:TM, but didn't find anything useful. I don't recall it being mentioned in any episode, either. Has anyone at least tried to do some unofficial calculations about its volume and approximate mass, maybe?

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Aban Rune
Former ascended being
Member # 226

 - posted      Profile for Aban Rune     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I believe it is officially classified as "Hella Massive".

I would've thought it would be in the DS9:TM too... just go with Hella Massive.

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
So massive, they'll never find all of O'Brien's victims. [Wink]

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Might they have mentioned the mass when O'Brien was putting up that field in "Emissary"? Just a thought.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I thought of that. No such luck.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
SoundEffect
Active Member
Member # 926

 - posted      Profile for SoundEffect     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Making of Deep Space Nine book says Okuda and Sternbach calculated the station was approximately 1350m in diameter (about 2.1 x the Galaxy Class length) and that the station's mass was 10.12 million metric tonnes.

--------------------
Stephen L.
-Maritime Science Fiction Modelers-

Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ah, thank you! I've got the "Making of" book, but left it at home... [Smile]

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
He knows this stuff in his head...it's scary.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Humans and aliens wrapped in two million, five hundred thousand tons of spinning metal, all alone in the night." -- Sorry, wrong series.

Wow, by Trek standards Babylon 5 must have been made out of paper mache. The sets often seemed to support the notion. [Smile]

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Don't forget that B5 was hollow, though. That probably counts for some of the difference. But yeah, it is quite a difference...

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Mark Nguyen
I'm a daddy now!
Member # 469

 - posted      Profile for Mark Nguyen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
B5 also uses wretched Imperial units, so it's actually 2 268 000 metric tons vs. DS9. And B5 is no more than half or two thirds empty space, tops. The dorsal cargo structure, radiator complex, and power generator section are many times the volume of DS9 alone.

Mark

--------------------
"This is my timey-wimey detector. Goes ding when there's stuff." - Doctor Who
The 404s - Improv Comedy | Mark's Starship Bridge Designs | Anime Alberta

Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256

 - posted      Profile for Cartman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IIRC, the 2.5 million figure is for the outer casing only. B5's total mass is closer to 9 billion tons (or so JMS has allegedly said, but I reeeaaally cannot be arsed to weed through ten years' worth of rec.arts posts right now to verify that B)).
Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's up at the Lurker's Guide, I believe. But I also cannot be arsed going through all those episode listings.

--------------------
Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Mucus
Senior Member
Member # 24

 - posted      Profile for Mucus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
And one of the people there, who had been with SDI and the Space
Program for 12 years, currently a top-level NASA consultant, pulled me
aside and said that after seeing the line about the gravity not letting
the body get very far -- and THAT is what was said in the script, and in
the episode, NOT your characterization of a body "bound" to the hull --
he said he sat down to do the math required to come up with the actuall
MASS of B5, starting with the 2.5 million tons of actual structure, plus
likely vegetation, quarters, occupants, ships docked inside...and when
you add it all up, it came to about the same mass as a fairly small
moon...and IT WOULD BE ENOUGH TO KEEP THE BODY FROM -- AS STATED IN THE
SCRIPT -- GETTING VERY FAR.

I think its in reference to someone complaining about whether or not a body being thrown out of an airlock would be trapped by the station's gravity or not.

link

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Guardian 2000
Senior Member
Member # 743

 - posted      Profile for Guardian 2000     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hopefully, I'll soon be updating my Volumetrics page with DS9's volume, thanks to a visitor with Lightwave and spare time. That'll give us a common frame of reference.

That done, I'd imagine that DS9 would be on the light side as far as density is concerned. If we assume that nacelles are very dense (supported in part by Voyager's speedboat shuttle not toppling over, along with other points (esp. non-canon ones)), then DS9, being nacelle-less, shouldn't be too massive.

On the other hand, the whole frickin' thing is spindly parts with lots of hull material, unlike a very voluminous Galaxy hull . . . so that would drive it up a bit.

So anyway, if we for the moment assume DS9 is as voluminous as, say, 10 Galaxy Class starships (that's just a ballpark estimate off the top of my head), I'd imagine that her mass should be on the order of 70-100 million metric tons.

More on starship masses and the episodic basis from which I guesstimated that figure:

http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWvolumetrics.html

--------------------
. . . ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

G2k's ST v. SW Tech Assessment

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3