Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » Officers' Lounge » US History/Alternate Histories/Republic of Texas/etc (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: US History/Alternate Histories/Republic of Texas/etc
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, Omega and I were having a bit of a discussion and thought we'd open it up to everyone. I'm currently reading Harry Turtledove's "American Empire" series and needed some clarifications on things. I must confess, my US history isn't exactly up to par. I'm not too sure on things that happened, like acquisition of land in the formation days. One thing that particularly interests me is the Republic of Texas. How it formed, why'd it join the US, etc. I remember a Sliders episode where they slid into San Francisco but it was part of the Republic of Texas. As they explained in the episode, the Republic remained independant and spread its borders all the way to the west coast or something like that. Any one care to educate me on these matters? Thanks.

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bleh. Flashbacks to seventh grade history. Essentially, you have Stephen F. Austin and his father who convinced the Mexican government to allow US citizens into Tejas to set-up colonies. They did, and they did.

US citizens arose in large groups establishing many large colonies in the hill country and southern coastal plains. Soon, the US citizens were beginning to outnumber the Mexican citizens, so Mexico tried to stem the flow of US citizens into Tejas (now called Texas by the US citizens). The Mexicans and the US citizens got really pissed at each over various things like taxation (US citizens felt they paid too much in violation of the settlement treaties), loyalty (Mexico felt the US citizens should be loyal to Mexico first since Texas was their's), slavery (US citizens wanted it, but Mexico wanted to phase it out), and control (Mexico began asserting greater control on Texas and even took Austin in custody and sent him to prison for a while).

So, war breaks out. The US citizens in Texas declared themselves Texans and rebelled against Mexico. They claimed their independence; a constitution and provisional government was set up at Washington-on-the-Brazos. Sam Houston took control of the Texas Army. Mexican forces always outnumbered the Texan forces and the fights were brutal (the Alamo, Goliad, San Jacinto in particular).

Eventually, Texas won it's independence from Mexico following the Battle of San Jacinto. Santa Ana, leader of Mexico and her forces, was captured and forced to relinquish claims on Texas before being released. The Republic of Texas was proclaimed. There was much rejoicing.

Texas remained an independent nation for several years. Sam Houston served as president multiple times, and he and the other presidents were always switching the capitol of the country from Houston to Austin and back and forth. Finally, Texas decided just to join the US; Texas was annexed soon afterwards. Mexico felt vindicated in some regards seeing as how it was a common belief that the US was behind the rebellion (indeed, the US provided many of the supplies, but never actively joined the conflict).

However, Mexico disagreed about her border with Texas. The US and Texas said it was the Rio Grande. Mexico said it was much further north. So we get the Mexican-American War where the US stomped the Mexicans and made the Rio Grande the border. In addition, Mexico ceded it's territory that covered what is now New Mexico, Arizona, and parts of Nevada, Utah, and Colorado. Part of what was the northwestern portion of the Republic of Texas is sliced off and given to New Mexico. Texas didn't really want it anyway.

Not too long after all that, Texas joins with the Confederacy, although only one battle in the War of Northern Aggression was fought in Texas. The Battle of Palmito Ranch, strangely enough, was fought after the South had surrendered. No email in those days. We beat the crap out the Yankees, too. Many years later, George W. Bush is elected governor of Texas and then becomes the 43rd President of the United States. I'm sure there's other important stuff in there (like the UT A&M rivalry, NASA, etc), but I want to keep this under 5000 words.

And that is what my memory recalls from Texas History. Yay.

Those are the basics.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
War of Northern Aggression
Also appropriately known as the War of Southern Stupidity, and/or the War of Northern Righteousness.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jeff, please set your iso-sarcasm detector to high when you read my posts. kthxbi.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If I recall correctly, the US generals who did the original negotiations were actually planning to annex ALL of Mexico as a result of the war. But within a few days, higher-ranked negotiatiors took over and passed on that idea.

Maybe I'm getting the details wrong... however it happened, there was a chance that we could've taken over the entire country. How different would things have gone then?

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Less bitching about "damn illegal wetbacks"?

Siggy: don't tell me to set my scarasmometer "hi" when yours is set to "obtuse."

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Now that you mention it, MinutiaeMan, I do vaguely recall something about the US considering conquering all of Mexico. I think we touched on that once in one of my Latin American history classes. As for how things would be different, it's hard to say. The Hispanic voting block would be freakin' huge. We'd have to go to Central America for cheap medication and anything we can't get easily here. And we'd probably be facing some of the internal chaos that Mexico faced in the 19th century (though not all of it).

And, Jeff, I'll tell you what to do if I feel like it, Yankeeboy. kthxbi.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You're not telling me anything if "kthxbi" actually exists in your vocabulary.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
James K. Polk!
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Y'know, you don't get to say anything until you keep up with your Buffy reviews Simon.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah! Plzkthxbi.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256

 - posted      Profile for Cartman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Please? Ok? Thanks. Bye.

That will be one POWARUP, TYVM.

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Siegfried
Fullmetal Pompatus
Member # 29

 - posted      Profile for Siegfried     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Shibby.

--------------------
The philosopher's stone. Those who possess it are no longer bound by the laws of equivalent exchange in alchemy. They gain without sacrifice and create without equal exchange. We searched for it, and we found it.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wraith
Zen Riot Activist
Member # 779

 - posted      Profile for Wraith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
If I recall correctly, the US generals who did the original negotiations were actually planning to annex ALL of Mexico as a result of the war. But within a few days, higher-ranked negotiatiors took over and passed on that idea.

Other way round. [Smile] It was originally intended just to annex the bits that eventually were annexed and a negotiator was despatched with instructions to that effect. Then it was decided that in fact the victory was so complete they may as well annex the whole lot but by the time they got the message to the guy doing the negotiating, it was too late.

--------------------
"I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw

Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Veers
You first
Member # 661

 - posted      Profile for Veers         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We should at least have annexed the Baja Penninsula. Mexico doesn't need it, and if we did, California would be huge!

--------------------
Meh

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3