T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
The359
Member # 37
|
posted
Acocdrnig to an elgnsih unviesitry sutdy, the oredr of letetrs in a wrod dno't mttaer. The olny thnig thta's iopmrantt is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer of eevry word is in the crorcet ptoision. The rset can be jmbueld and one is stlil albe to raed the txet.
Pterty fknuy...
|
Cartman
Member # 256
|
posted
Jst lk mttng vwls stll lvs txt smwht lgbl, whrs rmvng cnsnnts ae oe i e o i a eea u eei u.
|
MinutiaeMan
Member # 444
|
posted
Vrey itnnreesitg!
|
First of Two
Member # 16
|
posted
spiutd usniitvrey.
|
Omega
Member # 91
|
posted
Aahtsss.
|
PsyLiam
Member # 73
|
posted
As much fun as a thread of everyone doing this is:
Isn't there some sort of catch? Reading isn't just a case of looking at letters and reading a word. People recognise shapes, they think in advance what the next word is going to be, they associate, and do other crazy and complex things.
So when the words are mixed-up, they state that people can still read them. Which is obviously true. But can they read them as quickly?
|
The359
Member # 37
|
posted
I seem to be able to read it just a tad bit slower, but nothing that I couldn't handle for a given period of time trying to read.
|
Balaam Xumucane
Member # 419
|
posted
This is how we will communicate when the machines make us their slaves. But what about words the reader doesn't recognize or proper names. I suspect those might be problematic. It does provide that two and three letter words will always be correct. I read 359s initial post with surprising ease. On the other hand, and perhaps I'm thick, but I still haven't figured out Omega's jumble. Insufficient context, I suspect.
|
CaptainMike20X6
Member # 709
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Balaam Xumucane: I still haven't figured out Omega's jumble. No context, I suspect.
this happens to me when i read his non-encoded posts also...
|
Cartman
Member # 256
|
posted
"This is how we will communicate when the machines make us their slaves."
01000001011000110111010001110101011000010110110001 10110001111001001011000010000001110100011010000110 10010111001100100000011010010111001100100000011010 00011011110111011100100000011101110110010100100000 01110111011011110111010101101100011001000010000001 10001101101111011011010110110101110101011011100110 10010110001101100001011101000110010100101110
|
Nim
Member # 205
|
posted
Omega said "Tha's ass". Street lingo for "you've got something good there", he's obviously praising this new system of communication.
|
Nim
Member # 205
|
posted
"This is how we will communicate when the machines make us their slaves."
No, then you will speak like this:
"Am I here?" "Is this still a cookie?" "Is there a spoon?" "Am I a spoon?" "Follow the white rabbit." "Clean and cook the rabbit." "Use rabbit fur as hat." "Are you from the IRS?" "Do the IRS have earplug radios?" "Out of my way, old man, I'm gonna go through both doors at the same time, you just watch!"
|
Omega
Member # 91
|
posted
A cikooe for the fsirt poresn who fgriues it out.
|
The359
Member # 37
|
posted
He said "Asshats"
duh...
|
Ritten
Member # 417
|
posted
No he truly said 'Aahtsss', which, men in those blue grass areas say when you kick their sister's in the chin....
Damn you Cartman, ,I was going to bring up Binarian(??)....
|
PsyLiam
Member # 73
|
posted
"Ashtass"? Perhaps the real first name of that retard child with the electric rat?
And when the machines make us slaves, we will all communicate like this:
"I hate being a slave." "What do you hate about being a slave?" "I have no freedom." "I see." "I want freedom." "Say, do you suffer from any psychological problems?" "Fuck off."
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Douglas Hofstadter talks a little about our semiotic adaptability in Metamagical Themas.
|
Mark Nguyen
Member # 469
|
posted
So... Where is this original report? I'd like to read it.
Mark
|