It has some right ideas about why Star Trek relationships don't work, negative portrayal of homosexual relationships and an attitude about relationships circa Captain Proton.
------------------
I'd also have to take issue with the description of Roddenberry. TOS had a sixties view of sex, sure. But the first pilot had a woman who seemed neither dumb nor "available". And Uhura and Chapel, while indeed subordinate, were never treated as objects by the crew.
Then again, I'll be the first to admit that my views on relationships are a bit skewed in the first place.
------------------
"Something I can't comprehend. Something so complex and couched in its equation. So dense that light cannot escape from."
--
Soul Coughing
------------------
Outside of a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside of a dog, it's to dark to read. Groucho Marx
------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, DS9 'Tears of the Prophets')
I don't know about you all, but I never gave a rats behind whether Picard and Crusher got it on or not. Never really liked the Worf/Dax or Kira/Odo story lines. The only couple on trek that had much interest for me was Kieko and Miles, and that was mostly to watch them fight.
------------------
Outside of a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside of a dog, it's to dark to read. Groucho Marx
------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
------------------
"Something I can't comprehend. Something so complex and couched in its equation. So dense that light cannot escape from."
--
Soul Coughing
------------------
Outside of a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside of a dog, it's to dark to read. Groucho Marx
[This message has been edited by Kosh (edited August 30, 1999).]