Flare Sci-Fi Forums: Something about the title

This is topic Something about the title in forum General Trek at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/3/601.html

Posted by Xanthi on :

I'm new to this forum so forgive me if somebody else has raised this issue already. I know hearing the same arguments gets tedious.

Anyway.

Once again this is regarding series V. Somewhere (not exactly sure of the source)I read that the producers have decided to leave the "Star Trek" out of the new series' title, which this same source believes will be called 'Enterprise'. Yet the same people who believe in the 'Enterprise' premise use the fact that the sites www.startrekenterprise.com,net and org have been registered by paramount as proof that the pre TOS setting is true. Doesn't this contradict what they believe the producers said about the title? (by they I am refering to the source, sorry to be so vague!)

Maybe this is just me holding on to the little hope I have left that it wont be set in the 'past' so to speak but I just thought I'd bring it up. I wonder what Gene would think if he was still around. I bet he wouldn't be too pleased if these plans are true.

Well that's just my opinion

------------------

Posted by Lee (Member # 393) on :

Welcome. Good points raised. 8)

------------------
"It strikes me that there are enough episodes of the Simpsons that people could speak entirely in Simpsonese, using references from the show to explain or describe an endless series of situations. Nelson and Apu . . . at Tinagra.

But now I�ve brought Star Trek into it again, haven�t I. Sorry."

- James Lileks, 09/04/2001

Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :

www.enterprise.com and .net are already in use.

Also if you had a website, you'd probably try to get the most obvious URL as possible, right?

------------------
"We have a good arrangement. He supplies the weapons, I use them."
- Blade

Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :

Gene wasn't pleased at some aspects of ST VI (and other Star Trek movies. Not just V). I think he'd have probably had a fit at DS9.

------------------
You know, when Comedy Central asked us to do a Thanksgiving episode, the first thought that went through my mind was, "Boy, I'd like to have sex with Jennifer Aniston."
-Trey Parker, co-creator of South Park

Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :

Trying to please dead people is pointless, unless, of course, they have good lawyers.

------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :

I would imagine that, when writing a new episode or series or movie or book, their main objective isn't to create to please Gene. Disregarding the issue of giving Gene too much credit, and him having a quicker ass-pull than Darkstar himself, the audience is much more alive.

My house is like, a billion years old. When we were doing renovations, I don't think our concern was "Will this fit with what the original builder thought?" Seeing as how the original house had outdoor bathrooms, I think it's rightly fine that we decided to built the house to please ourselves.

------------------
"Instructed by history and reflection, Julian was persuaded that, if the diseases of the body may sometimes be cured by salutary violence, neither steel nor fire can eradicate the erroneous opinions of the mind."

-Edward Gibbons, The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire.

Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :

To be blunt, I imagine Rick Berman knows better than maybe only two or three other people what Gene would or would've wanted. The fans who have a paranoid hatred of Berman/Braga are just putting words into Gene's mouth when they say that he'd oppose a prequel.

------------------
"I can be creative when I have a good idea. That just happens way too rarely."
-Omega, April 6

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Actually, Berman ran a rough concept of DS9 past Gene before he died ... and Gene approved.

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.

Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :

Even if he didn't, the show still would have aired. I don't believe he wielded any power then, other than running down the halls saying "THERE ARE SIX GALAXIES!!! I HAVE DECREED IT SO!! I AM A GOLDEN GOD!"

-Edward Gibbons, The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire.

Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :

He was the Sentry?

I thought that Gene would have disapproved of teh Maquis, since humans were suppossed to be, like, great, in the 24th century. Dude.

Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :

Actually, Gene (Ghu rest his soul) had a few ideas which were either "off-the-wall" or "too advanced for 20th century minds" - depending upon your point of view.

The most obvious is the Crusher quote (sic):
"People were actually scared of death - it terrified them!"

As soon as I heard that, I thought - hey - we've evolved! Talk about a radical philisophical change, this will make the entire series different than anything we've ever seen.

Turns out Gene was farting in a windstorm. Nothing ever came of it - Riker was sure terrified in "Skin of Evil" - as was Troi.

My point is, sometimes a person can indeed improve on another's idea - even if the originator is acknowledged as a genious. It is called "standing upon the shoulders of giants".

------------------
Faster than light - no left or right.

Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :

I cannot seem to recall Norman Felton ever being called a genius. Nor has Richard Irving ever been called one. The same goes with Kevin Reynolds and Herbert Brodkin.

I think we shouldn't be so cavalier about which people we're labelling as geniuses, as evidenced above, there are many other people who produced 60's television shows, which apparently is the qualification for the label.

-Edward Gibbons, The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire.