Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Uprated Constitution class?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] So based on this, the Eagle wouldn't be a Constitution at all? Instead, it would be the middle ship in the "size comparison chart"? Well, this would make things more palatable for those of us who don't want to believe in Connies with NCC-956 registries... Did I understand correctly that the second page shows three starships (2 Constitutions, one unknown) on a "star system map" and three starships "(1 Constitution, 2 different unknowns) in a "size comparison chart"? This would be an interesting discrepancy. Perhaps it means that three types of starships would participate in the maneuver, and three formations would be created out of these types. Two formations would have Constitutions as their most prominent ships, while one would have that unknown type as the lead ship. The total number of ships in the operation would then be at least four, with this fourth ship not displayed on the map because of being "subordinate" to a displayed Constitution. Timo Saloniemi [This message has been edited by Timo (edited January 03, 2001).] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3