Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Help with my shiplist
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] Most of the Connie registries in the Encyclopedia come off of that chart from "Court Martial" (TOS). It was Greg Jein who originally matched those numbers to Connies back in 1975, and his list was published in the magazine [i]T-Negative[/i]. (Incidentally, that was the same year that Franz Joseph's book containing his own numbering scheme was published, which has become so popular with Fandom-inclined folks. Even Spikey uses it, though it's nowhere even close to being either canon or official.) Here's a helpful guide: [b] http://steve.pugh.net/fleet/con_reg.html [/b] Anyways, the official Paramount (Okuda's) list is mainly based off of Jein's list, with a few alterations like the [i]Eagle[/i] and [i]Endeavour[/i], which for some reason were assigned different numbers by Okuda for TUC. So that chart represents as follows (though the quality of this screencap may not have tipped you off to all of them): NCC-1709 (Lexington) NCC-1631 (Intrepid)* NCC-1703 (Hood) NCC-1672 (Exeter) NCC-1664 (Excalibur) NCC-1697 (Essex) NCC-1701 (Enterprise) NCC-1718 (Unknown) NCC-1685 (Unknown) NCC-1700 (Constitution) *There has been some confusion over whether the [i]Intrepid[/i] is NCC-1631 or NCC-1831. From some screenshots it looks like it could be either one. The Encyclopedias list both numbers in various places (1831 in Connie entry, 1631 in [i]Intrepid[/i] entry and shiplist.) But all other sources (Chronology and official website) list 1631 exclusively, and that's the number from Jein's original list, so I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be 1631. To answer your second question, I believe this was the only TOS registry chart seen, though according to Okuda there was a screen in "Space Seed" that showed the [i]Constitution[/i]'s reg to be NCC-1700, but I've never been able to spot it. Thirdly, I've never heard of or seen any picture of the actual okudagram from TUC, but a reproduction of it's contents (supposedly furnished by Okuda himself) was in Bjo Trimble's [i]Concordance[/i]. Here is that information: [b]SMA=Starship Mission Assignment okudagram (Current assignment in parentheses) OR=Operation Retrieve chart U.S.S. Ahwahnee NCC-2048 SMA (deep space exploration) + OR U.S.S. Challenger NCC-2032 SMA (deep space exploration) + OR U.S.S. Constellation NX-1974 SMA (certification tests) U.S.S. Eagle NCC-956 SMA (colony resupply mission) + OR U.S.S. Emden NCC-1856 SMA (neutral zone patrol) U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-1895 SMA (deep space exploration) + OR U.S.S. Helin NCC-1692 SMA (scientific survey ship on neutral zone patrol in sector 21290) U.S.S. John Muir NCC-1732 SMA (upgrade at Starbase 24) U.S.S. Kongo NCC-1710 SMA (neutral zone patrol) U.S.S. Korolev NCC-2014 SMA (diplomatic mission) U.S.S. Lantree NCC-1837 SMA (carrying colony supplies in sector 22858) U.S.S. Oberth NCC-602 SMA (deep space exploration) U.S.S. Potemkin NCC-1657 SMA (scientific survey) + OR U.S.S. Republic NCC-1371 SMA (neutral zone patrol) U.S.S. Scovil NCC-1598 SMA (astronomical research) + OR U.S.S. Springfield NCC-1963 SMA (neutral zone patrol) + OR U.S.S. Whorfin NCC-1024 SMA (deep space explorer on neutral zone patrol)[/b] -MMoM :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3