Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Fighters
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by J: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by AndrewR: [qb]1, 5 and 10 seem to be the three Runabouts... but that isn't the scene from The Maquis Part II is it?[/qb][/QUOTE]No this is still from Preemptive Strike... I don't have a single episode of DS9 on tape [wish I did though]. 1, 5, and 10 are the Subimpulse ship, in the blurry blown up image used to number each of the vessels it looks like they might be a runabout or a large shuttle [Insurrection Scout, Type-12, Sovereign Yatch... etc], but the later close-ups go into great detail on each ship tracking their movements--- they really aren't runabouts... [QUOTE]Originally posted by Time: [qb] (In my best British understatement voice) Pretty damned impressive, sir... (/In my best British understatement voice)[/qb] Then Later: [qb]I also have reservations about applying the name "Peregrine class" to any specific design at this point, but that's another matter...[/qb][/QUOTE](brit)Why thank you my good sir, thank you(brit) As for that Peregrine bit, I think I emailed you about it sometime ago... what I eventually decided to do was go with the most used instead of a literal use of evidence [gee that sounds extremely legalistic]. Most people call that the Peregrine, I would probably get plenty more emails about not calling it the Peregrine than I would calling it the Peregrine... just be glad I didn't name the other three "classes" <EG> [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3