Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Court Martial Starships
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [QB] Yup. And you can't call the refit [i]Enterprise[/i]-class either, since STVI confirmed it to be [i]Constitution[/i]-class. It may have been Jeffries idea to have all the Constitutions be NCC-17xx, and you could argue that they were, but the Constellation would stand up and loudly shout out "OI! You're wrong!". This isn't something like the Melbourne which can be easily explained away. The Constellation, with registy of NCC-1017, was shown extremely clearly on screen. And (anticipating the Yamoto arguement), has never been contradicted on screen. So, what can we learn from this? That there was at least one [i]Constitution[/i] whos registry began with something other than NCC-17xx, and that there will always be people who believe the Earth is flat, that bitter is better than larger, and that the Enterprise was a Starship/[i]Enterprise[/i]-class starship. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3