T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
The359
Member # 37
|
posted
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Lot/7783/equinox/equinox6.jpg That link shows the USS Equinox is extreme close-up (don't click the link if you don't want spoilers). Is it just me, or does it look like the registry says NCC-72361? I know Okuda said it was NCC-72381, but could this be another slip of his mind? ------------------ "I am Sci-Fi" -The 359
|
Black Knight
Member # 134
|
posted
It could be either. It does look more like 72361 in that picture, but it could just be the lighting.------------------ A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson
|
Elim Garak
Member # 14
|
posted
http://frankg.dgne.com/sff/equinox10.jpg The image Frank posted. But it doesn't seem to want to help, either. I'd say that if it's Okuda's word versus one possible interpretation that could or could not support an opposing view, go with Okuda... ------------------ Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
|
Black Knight
Member # 134
|
posted
Frank's pic looks more like an 8.------------------ A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson
|
Laz1701
|
posted
It looks like 72361 in that vidcap I made, but it's definitely 72381. If you watch the actual footage the vidcap comes from, you can see it's an 8 and not a 6.------------------ The Starship Encyclopedia
|