Flare Sci-Fi Forums: NCC-72381 or NCC-72361?

my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

»	Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » NCC-72381 or NCC-72361?

Author

Topic: NCC-72381 or NCC-72361?

The359
The bitch is back
Member # 37

posted

http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Lot/7783/equinox/equinox6.jpg

That link shows the USS Equinox is extreme close-up (don't click the link if you don't want spoilers). Is it just me, or does it look like the registry says NCC-72361? I know Okuda said it was NCC-72381, but could this be another slip of his mind?

------------------
"I am Sci-Fi"
-The 359

Registered: Mar 1999 | IP: Logged

Black Knight
Active Member
Member # 134

posted

It could be either. It does look more like 72361 in that picture, but it could just be the lighting.

------------------
A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson

Registered: May 1999 | IP: Logged

Elim Garak
Plain and simple
Member # 14

posted

http://frankg.dgne.com/sff/equinox10.jpg

The image Frank posted.

But it doesn't seem to want to help, either. I'd say that if it's Okuda's word versus one possible interpretation that could or could not support an opposing view, go with Okuda...

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")

Registered: Mar 1999 | IP: Logged

Black Knight
Active Member
Member # 134

posted

Frank's pic looks more like an 8.

------------------
A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson

Registered: May 1999 | IP: Logged

Laz1701
Ex-Member

posted

It looks like 72361 in that vidcap I made, but it's definitely 72381. If you watch the actual footage the vidcap comes from, you can see it's an 8 and not a 6.

------------------
The Starship Encyclopedia

IP: Logged

Printer-friendly view of this topic