T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
I remember hearing that this one was visible onscreen. Anybody have a vidcap or the contents at the least?Thanks, Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide
|
Aethelwer
Member # 36
|
posted
Yes.------------------ Frank's Home Page "I firmly believe that the entire Star Trek universe exists only to make sure we continue to appreciate Star Wars and Babylon 5." - Andy Ihnatko
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
"Give me liberty or give me death"? That SOOO cheesily patriotic. They should have put something by Benjamin Franklin instead.BTW, that's stardate 52888.3? Am I wrong, or is this the first starship that wasn't commissioned at noon? (.5) Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide
|
Michael Dracon
Member # 4
|
posted
The number behind the point has absolutly nothing to do with the time of the day.------------------ Presenting the NX-59650. It can slice! It can dice! It can seperate into THREE parts!! Now available with THREE FULL warpcores! But wait! Buy now, and get a free number upgrade to NX-74913! To order, call: 0800-PROMETHEUS
|
Elim Garak
Member # 14
|
posted
Maybe they had a busy schedule that day and couldn't launch the ship at noon...?------------------ Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
Well, if you were to trust Gene Roddenberry and the Star Trek Phase II Writers' Bible, a stardate is roughly a day and 1313.5 is noon on one day, while 1314.5 is noon on the next day. But yes, of course, I was just joking. Still, a stardate *can* be a day long occassionally, as we've seen in numerous TNG episodes.BTW, I looked up the episode's stardate in the James Dixon timeline and it's on 52861.3 that Sisko was given command over the Sao Paulo. Maybe I've misread something and it's 52388.3? Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide [This message has been edited by Boris (edited October 08, 1999).] [This message has been edited by Boris (edited October 08, 1999).]
|
Michael Dracon
Member # 4
|
posted
or 52688.3------------------ Presenting the NX-59650. It can slice! It can dice! It can seperate into THREE parts!! Now available with THREE FULL warpcores! But wait! Buy now, and get a free number upgrade to NX-74913! To order, call: 0800-PROMETHEUS
|
Hobbes
Member # 138
|
posted
I wonder why is doesn't have Defiant-class on it.------------------ "The keyboard, how quaint." Federation Starship Datalink - Starship site of the new millennium.
|
Fabrux
Member # 71
|
posted
Boris: Where is this updated version of the JD Timeline? The only version that I know of is at Caltech and it hasn't been updated in years------------------ Go brain go. -Qualcomm sloagan [This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited October 09, 1999).]
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
Fabrux: Ohmygod....  Caltech has Version 6. The latest one is Version 12, including everything through the end of DS9 and the fifth season of Voyager. Go to http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Crater/2077/scifi.htm for the latest version and a bunch of other James Dixon files. Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide
|
AndrewR
Member # 44
|
posted
I could SWEAR that the plaque says 53...not stardate 52... !?! and what is the registry NCC-45...!! - is that our first 45? Oh, and maybe they did away with the tradition of the noon launch, because of the war. ------------------ "The story..." Londo says, "is not over yet. The story is never over." [This message has been edited by AndrewR (edited October 09, 1999).]
|
Galen
Member # 72
|
posted
So is there a consensus on the registry and launch date for the Sao Paolo?------------------ "Victory is Life!"
|
Aethelwer
Member # 36
|
posted
There are better images of the plaque out there, BTW, but I don't know of the URLs of any.------------------ Frank's Home Page "I firmly believe that the entire Star Trek universe exists only to make sure we continue to appreciate Star Wars and Babylon 5." - Andy Ihnatko
|
Elim Garak
Member # 14
|
posted
Sure looks like NCC-75533 to me...------------------ Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
|
Aethelwer
Member # 36
|
posted
The registry is NCC-75633, IIRC------------------ Frank's Home Page "I firmly believe that the entire Star Trek universe exists only to make sure we continue to appreciate Star Wars and Babylon 5." - Andy Ihnatko
|
Dax
Member # 191
|
posted
Here's a picture of the ded plaque that I stole from Maximum Defiant. Sao Paulo Ded Plaque------------------ "Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets) Dax's Ships of STAR TREK
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
Now that certainly looks like 52589.3 to me.Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide [This message has been edited by Boris (edited October 10, 1999).]
|
Sunspot
Member # 77
|
posted
Well, I think the stardate can be a day, with the post-decimal number remaining for a day due to the computer compensating for time dilation.[Somewhere in the TNG Manual it says something like that] ------------------ �T� eres que lo como!
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
And I thought the timeline had not been updated for a long time...Oh my god, how big is this text file? 2780K! ------------------ Get your free signature at Ex Astris Scientia
|
Bernd
Member # 6
|
posted
BTW, couldn't they find a quote related to Brazil?It's really annoying to see that only English-speaking people deliver great quotes. ------------------ Get your free signature at Ex Astris Scientia
|
Jim Phelps
Member # 102
|
posted
Yeah, the file is extremely large, and I've only read sections of it. However, the Notes section (which describes how the timeline was arrived at) is extremely interesting for its unusual methodology.Boris ------------------ "Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story." ---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide
|