This is topic Cosmic Banana Peel Drive... in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/634.html

Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
I have not seen the episode(s) with any vessels that use the "quantum slipstream". The only ship I have seen (for certain) equipped with it is the Dauntless (at Pedro's Ship-o-Rama). I have questions, some of them undoubtedly stupid, but since I need the answers, I'll risk it anyway:

  1. What is the quantum slipstream drive?

  2. How is it supposed to work?

  3. How fast is it?

  4. Does it "supplement" (or augment) warp drive or is it a replacement?

  5. Does it require a different power source than the ship's matter/antimatter reactor assembly or does it run on "regular"?

  6. If there have been other ships than the Dauntless equipped with the drive, what visual elements do they have in common (shape, light-emitting thingies, etc.)?

I may have more questions later when I get the answers to these. I would like to create a (or some) ships equipped with that drive, I hesitate to render any Q-S drive-equipped vessels until I know what chararacteristics they ought to have.

Thank you.

--Baloo

------------------
"The mark of a truly great mind isn't whether you're right or wrong. It's how well you can weasel out of a jam."
--Cecil Adams
Come Hither and Yawn...


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Note: This is what I think it is:

1: Similar to the transwarp conduits seen in 'Dark Frontier', but the color is light blue (Also stated by Seven that it was similar).
If you haven't seen DF: It is a tunnel, a bit like in Star Wars and Sliders (early season version, but straight ahead )

2 and 6: The deflector emits the <speak=Paris>whatever it is</speak>, which is visible as a light blue glow on the full surface of the ship. Then it is emitted as a tunnel when you are at maximum impuls speed. We've seen Voyager do is as well. The 'nacelles' are probably used for changing the cource of the tunnel.

3: They said 60.000 lightyears in 3 months, but it is probably even faster.

4: Replacement

5: The Dauntless had something different, it was not stated what it was, but it wasn't matter/antimatter. Voyager managed to do with some modifications to the warp core.


I myself have created several ships that use what I call a Quantum Warpdrive, which is supposed to be a Borg/Dauntless type combination.

------------------
Gravity sucks!

(-=\V/=-)

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited February 16, 2000).]
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
The slipstream drive that the Voy crew built was actually alot faster than the one on Arturis' ship. When they used it in "Timeless" they made it all the way to the outscirts of the Alpha Quadrant in just a few minutes!! It would've taken them 3 months aboard Arturis' ship.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Voyager used the Slipstream twice!
The first was the same as Arturis' ship. Tom said they were at the maximum, and they barely got to Arturis' ship.

The second was an improved version made by Seven, and that one was indeed a lot faster.

------------------
Gravity sucks!

(-=\V/=-)
 


Posted by Brown_supahero (Member # 83) on :
 
didn't the borg assimalte this drive? Now why aren't the wreaking havoc around the galaxy with this new technology

------------------
For all you Fighting needs
http://www.fighters.net



 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
That's where it gets scary:

Upto the episode where the Quantum Slipstream is introduced ('Hope and Fear')we always saw the Borg warp field with the 'standard look'. Dark Frontier is the first episode after 'Hope and Fear' that shows the conduits...

------------------
Gravity sucks!

(-=\V/=-)
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
When Seven anaylized the Slipstream aboard the Dauntless, though, she seemed fairly unimpressed and even said that it was similar to the Borg's transwarp conduits.

In fact, as early as Descent, TNG, the Borg were using some sort of Transwarp tunnels to and from the Delta Quadrant.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
I KNEW someone was going to mention that...

Were talking about conduits (temporarly) made by SHIPS here!

And I thought that conduit was only a few hundred lightyears long at most.

Phew.. Sorry about sounding blunt.

------------------
Gravity sucks!

(-=\V/=-)
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
"SOME SORT of Transwarp tunnels".

I didn't say they were the SAME THING! I simply meant that the Borg were already familiar with similar technology.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore



 


Posted by Dat (Member # 302) on :
 
In my opinion, Arturis' quantum slipstream drive is in fact similar to Borg transwarp, but since Seven didn't seemed impressed by it, it was probably slower that Borg transwarp. The Borg may still have a use for it though, but only as a backup or a supplement. Certainly not a replacement.

------------------
7 alarm clock: "Do not touch me."
Dilbert: "Then how do I turn you off?"
7: "Believe me, I am plenty turned off."
 


Posted by Individual 5748 on :
 
From what I understand, quantum velocity is equivalent to warp 9.9999999999..... and so on - never reaching transwarp but coming pretty damn close. Also, in "Timeless," Voyager's core is enhanced with Borg technology and utilizes something called bemonite or benomite crystals, which are apparently more difficult to come across than dilithium.

------------------
"Questions, comments, bring them to me. Problems, take them to Kinis."

 


Posted by Mythril (Member # 286) on :
 
the slipstream does not use normal space. It is a foucused tunnel of sub-sapce energy. At least that is what i think it said in the star trek magazine.

------------------
I am not responsible for the stupidity of other people.


 


Posted by KXZ (Member # 119) on :
 
In 'Timeless' Voyager flew 10,000 light years in 17 seconds. At that speed it would take them 170 seconds to go across the galaxy. That is just under 3 minutes. I wonder if the Federation will get anything better than warp drive, maybe it will be slipstream at this speed.

------------------
"You're right. They wouldn't be able to see anything but the top of your head. The glare could blind them."
-B'Ellana Torres, Virtuoso



 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Hmmm...

At that rate, you could get to the Andromeda galaxy in a bit less than an hour, and reach the edges of observable space (provided they're at 35 billion light year's distance) in something like 2 years.

------------------
"We adjust to anything. That�s the good news, and that�s what keeps the bad news coming."
--James Lileks
Come Hither and Yawn...


[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited February 18, 2000).]
 


Posted by KXZ (Member # 119) on :
 
And that's probably why if they develop slip stream as a new propulsions system to be used like warp, it won't go this fast. It would probably go as fast as it did in 'Hope and Fear' which would be 1 month to 20, 000 light years (beacuse it would have taken them 3 months from 60, 000 light years away).

------------------
"You're right. They wouldn't be able to see anything but the top of your head. The glare could blind them."
-B'Ellana Torres, Virtuoso



 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Now this is theoretically mind boggling - If you could get to the edges of observable space in less than an hour - say... does that mean you would actually see that part of space now - something that we could NEVER EVER seen... well not with in our lifetime... cause it takes billions of years for the light to reach us... So there could be something there - but we just can't see it yet... so as astronomers and cosmologists say they are peering back into time... doesn't that mean in a billion years - someone sent a strong enough signal from there (assuming they got there from Earth in under an hour) we'd see that signal in a Billion years... so for US they're 'back in time' but seeing as they have gone faster than the speed of light - for them - and the space that is around them when they get there... will be 'normal time'!?! so there cold be (for example) a huge thousand light year across beachball - for example) launched by a race... we could never have any idea that they ever existed until the light from them reached us in a billion years... (so could right now - that part of the universe be "imploding" or something - but we won't know about it for a billion years!?! does that mean that any warning that anything is coming towards us from Deep Space is limited by the speed of light?

Sorry that is a bit of a side track...

Andrew

------------------
"What a wonderful and amazing scheme have we here of the magnificent vastness of the Universe! So many Suns, so many Earths...!" - Christian Huygens, New Conjectures Concerning the Planetary Worlds, Their Inhabitants and Productions (ca 1670)


 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
The simple answer to your question is: "Yes".

I leave it to the physics students to point out errors in your logic, however. You eally ought not to write while you are in a panic. It makes it hard to follow your train of thought.

------------------
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-- William Pitt
Come Hither and Yawn...


 


Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :
 
And use paragraphs too, they're very convenient.

I'm in physics, but we're studying slinkies. Er, waves, actually. But we use slinkies!

------------------
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
-Mark Twain
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Excuse me for being late at this, but according to the Star Trek Magazine, Slipstream velocity is in the warp 9.9999 range.

Some numbers:
(c = lightspeed)
warp 9: 1516c (not: 1024c)
warp 9.9: 3053c
warp 9.99: 7912c
warp 9.999: 181053c (about 4 months for 60000 lightyears)

I think Sevens enhanced Slipstream drive will probably add only about two or three 9-s at maximum to that number, since the warp scale isn't exactly linear.


------------------
"I'm captain Kenny Redshirt of the Miranda Class USS Killedalot, NCC-1313."
"I know it is an old ship, but..."
KABOOOOMM!!
"Oh my God! They killed Kenny! You bastards!"

(-=\V/=-)

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited February 23, 2000).]
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Yeah, sorry I just got all excited and wanted to get down what I was thinking instead of doing it all neat. I'll edit it now, at the moment a prac is starting!

Andrew

------------------
"What a wonderful and amazing scheme have we here of the magnificent vastness of the Universe! So many Suns, so many Earths...!" - Christian Huygens, New Conjectures Concerning the Planetary Worlds, Their Inhabitants and Productions (ca 1670)


 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Erm... I'm not looking at any reference material now, so I'm not certain, but it seems to me that 1024c is warp 8...

------------------
Jay Leno: "In the story of 'Jack and the Beanstalk', what did the goose lay?"
"Bosco": "Everybody."
-The Tonight Show, "Jaywalking"
 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
No, it's 210. That's a bit more than warp 10 (old scale), and about warp 9 on the new scale. If Quantum slipstream drive only does that, why bother?

Just looking at the above responses, I think we can all agree that there are very few points of agreement regarding the Q-S drive . So far, all we've been able to determine is, with one apparently dissenting (or possibly just confused) opinion, it's fast, and ships that use it have to be streamlined or they can't use it very well.

If you have any episodes on tape that show it used, watch them and see what answers you can find for the following questions.

  1. How far do they travel each time they use it?

  2. Is it the same distance every time or is it different?

  3. Does there appear to be some relationship between how long they use it and how far they go?

  4. Does Jeri Ryan really need to wear those high heels or did the male crewmembers foist this item of apparel on her just because she's a Borg, and doean't know any better?

    "Suuuure you need these! They'll help you develop proper posture and compensate for the graticuole particles!"

    "The other crewmembers don't seem to require them?"

    "Er, well, y'see, you need these because of your nanites. Yeah! That's it! The gravy-whatever particles will disrupt your equilibruim if you don't wear them!"

    "Very well. I'll put them on."

    [Voice from offscreen:] "Yesss! She bought it! Woo-Hoo!"

------------------
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-- William Pitt
Come Hither and Yawn...

[This message has been edited by Baloo (edited February 23, 2000).]
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
About that warp 8/9 thing: Warp 9 is about 1516c, not 1024c. My mistake, sorry!
The above post is edited.

And we've seen the slipstream used 4 times: Twice by the Dauntless and twice by Voyager:

- In the first time that Voyager uses it, it appearantly has a maximum speed.
- The Dauntless was able to increase it's speed while inside the slipstream. Also it had a pre-programmed destination.
- Voyager was able to change the direction of the slipstream and the crew shut it down on their own when the stresses were to high.
- The second time Voyager uses it, it is a whole lot faster, but one mistake and they droped out of the slipstream and are out of control. Although you can stop the slipstream and just ease back into normal space.

It seems that you have almost the same freedom of movement as in normal warp. You can even program a destination for the slipstream, which is probably because at these high speeds you can very easely miss your destination.

To answer your questions:
1: Several 100 lightyears at the first time Voyager uses it, about 10000 the second time. The Dauntless made a jump of about 26 lightyears on autopilot, and the second time it went all the way to Borg space.

2: no

3: Not sure. There isn't enough information for that. But the Dauntless was able to increase it's speed while already inside the slipstream. So it hasn't got one single speed.

------------------
"I'm captain Kenny Redshirt of the Miranda Class USS Killedalot, NCC-1313."
"I know it is an old ship, but..."
KABOOOOMM!!
"Oh my God! They killed Kenny! You bastards!"

(-=\V/=-)

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited February 23, 2000).]
 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
One last question then:

Is it faster than subspace radio? If so, by how many orders of magnitude (approximate figures are appropriate).

--Baloo

------------------
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
-- William Pitt
Come Hither and Yawn...


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
If we assume that the best it can do is 60,000 ly in three months ("Hope and Fear") or 240,000 c, then it's only mariginally faster than subspace radio which according to the Encyclopedia does 200,000 c (or warp 9,9999) and according to the TNG Tech Manual perhaps 180,000 c (or warp 9,997).

If we assume it can go 10,000 ly in 17 seconds ("Timeless"), then it's a whopping 1,86*10^10 c, or NINETY THOUSAND TIMES faster than subspace radio.

Not to mention that subspace radio seems to have a maximum range of 22 lightyears. Or more exactly, the signal has to be boosted every 22 lightyears at the very least to keep up that 200,000 c speed; unboosted signals from the biggest transmitters slow down to lightspeed at 22 lightyears, and may slow down from the maximum speed of warp 9,999 even before that range.

So if you want to send a message to somebody farther than a hundred lightyears away, don't bother with subspace radio. Write a letter, take your time, and send the letter on a slipstream ship. As Baloo noted, the longest delivery time inside our galaxy is three minutes!

That kind of a drive would probably make starships as we know them an outdated concept. Perhaps we would see the return of MAD: if you threaten me, I'll press this button, and WAY before the sound of the click reaches my ears, my missiles have reached your star system and annihilated you. Even your fastest computer cannot react to the threat fast enough.

Timo Saloniemi
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3