The shuttlecraft carries the registry of a starship and a shuttlecraft number. However, the name of this starship is not on the shuttlecraft. What could be the explanation for this starship's name to be 'missing' from the shuttlecraft?
------------------
takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 19, 2000).]
------------------
Me: "Why don't you live in Hong Kong?"
Rachel Roberts: "Hong Kong? Nah. Oh, but we can live in China! Yeah, China has great Chinese food!"
(discussion with fellow classmate, 9/5/00)
TOS shuttles had the mothership registry, followed by a slash and a single-digit ID number. The name of the mothership was relatively easily readable underneath, while the name of the shuttle was applied as free-style "nose art".
In the E-D shuttles, the name Enterprise wasn't shown at all, only the registry 1701-D. The early type-7 shuttles and shuttlepods displayed a large two-digit ID number in addition, but the later type-6 vehicles had this in *very* fine print so that the same shuttle model could be used to represent different vehicles without altering the number. In each case, the name of the shuttle itself was in superfine print, not readable in most of the effects shots.
The Voyager shuttles have both the mothership rego and name in relatively bold print, but the shuttle ID and name are again in superfine print to prevent the viewers from seeing them in the VFX shots.
Since the shuttle from "Caretaker" is a type-6 one (or Class-6 if one insists, as per "The Outcast"), it theoretically shouldn't have the mothership name visible. And the multitude of signage practices seen so far implies that *anything* is possible anyway.
Timo Saloniemi
------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"
------------------
love's function is to fabricate unknownnness
--
E. E. Cummings
****
Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! And party everyday.
------------------
So why don't we make a little room in my BMW babe
Searching for some peace of mind
Hey I'll help you find it
I do believe that we are practicing the same religion
- from the song "Fastlove"
This is the starboard side of the Sacajawea, a Class 6 shuttlecraft: http://starshipmodeler.com/trek/rside.jpg
Now is the view of the starboard side of the unnamed shuttlecraft in "Caretaker": http://fitz8472.hypermart.net/unknown_71325.jpg
I would hazard a guess that the unnamed class 6 shuttlecraft is an uncomplete model. There is the gray vent panel behind the starboard window and the yellow 'patch' below midline at the aft. The three lines of information (starship registry, shuttlecraft number, and shuttlecraft name) are missing from beneath the starboard window, along with the name and a few structural features.
------------------
takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by targetemployee (edited September 20, 2000).]
------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"
------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
------------------
This is how i prefer the borg... in pieces!!! -- Janeway in Dark Frontier
Seventhworld, the new SciFi-Project
http://www.seventhworld.de
Soon to be featured StarTrek Nemesis
Visit Rogue Fleet! The new StarTrek Internet RPG.
RogueFleet
Applications are still running!
In light of this, a missing mothership name in a type-6 shouldn't be all that strange. It would in fact tie in with the idea that starship captains (or deckmasters?) get to name their shuttlecraft - they could be delivered unpainted, and it would be up to the personal tastes (and the edition of SF Field Manual gathering dust on the said deckmaster's shelf) what sort of labeling would be painted on. The person painting the shuttles of NCC-71325 would have different tastes from the one responsible for the shuttles of NCC-74656...
Timo Saloniemi
------------------
"And as we all know, a mesolytic quantumvector resonator is commonly
used to polarize isogravitic plasma-flux manifolds."
Starfleet Academy's Redshirt Guide to the Starfleet, 62nd edition,
2376.
------------------
Where's the bathroom on this ship?
Or is that a subtle hint that I'm getting TOO bold around here? :-P
Timo Saloniemi
------------------
Daniel: "Senator, we have reason to believe the Goa'uld are about to attack."
Kinsey: "Then I think they'll regret taking on the United States military!"
Daniel: "Oh, you're right. We'll just upload a virus into the mother ship."
This post sponsered in part by the Federation Starship Datalink
------------------
Where's the bathroom on this ship?
------------------
Remember December '59
The howling wind and the driving rain,
Remember the gallant men who drowned
On the lifeboat, Mona was her name.
------------------
"It's like the Star of David or something. But without the whole Judaism thing."
-Frank Gerratana, 17-Aug-2000