As far as I can tell there is not one single benefit to making a turbocar square or rectangular. It wastes space, because any curving horizontal section of track needs to be wider for a square car to make the turn. Square turbocars also cannot spin in place, so doors have to be on one side of the passage only. If you want them on boths sides, you'd have to have two sets of doors per car. And it isn't like you can fit more people into it or anything.
So that said, someone explain!
------------------
------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
As for the logic behind square turbolifts, I cannot think of any. Assuming the diameter of a circular turbolift is equal to the length of a square turbolift, then the square turbolift would have more floor area (but not much more to make any sort of different).
I will say, though, that it is easier to build rectangular tubes than circular tubes in construction projects. But in the 24th Century, that wouldn't a bit of difference.
One could assume that in the case of square/rectangular turbolifts that there are large junctions connecting the vertical and horizontal shafts. That could allow adequate room for change orientation before stopping at the final destination.
If someone could please check this out, how does the orientation of the emergency turbolift on the Enterprise-D differ from its position on the main bridge to the battle bridge? Does it appear that this lift needs to change orientation anywhere?
------------------
Nic: She's not a practicing lesbian. We need PRACTICING lesbians!
Me: I have a camcorder.
Nic: But no lesbians.
Me: Ahhh... no.
Nic: DAMN IT MAN! WE NEED LESBIANS! LOTS AND LOTS OF LESBIANS!
ICQ Conversation From January 23, 2001.
Mark
------------------
"Why build one, when you can have two at twice the price?"
- Carl Sagan, "Contact"
The cylindrar turbolifts of course pivot freely around their vertical axis so that they can access doorways in every conceivable direction. Since the lift tube in "Disaster" seemed rather wide, I wouldn't wonder if the lifts sometimes pivoted around other axes as well (they supposedly do have their own gravity plates, so turning a cab upside down wouldn't be too uncomfortable for the passengers).
A squarish turbolift would not be capable of such easy pivoting, but might be easier and sturdier to construct and operate. Thus, it would be used for the battle bridge expresslift connection where no pivoting ability is needed since there are only two stations, one at each end of an uninterrupted shaft.
Timo Saloniemi
Really... have you looked at those Defiant floor plans? They make very little sense, considering that the ship is only 120 meters (or 170, if you believe the TM -- I won't start THAT debate ). It's clearly too small to make such horizontal turbolifts really necessary.
------------------
You know, you really should keep a personal log. Why bore others needlessly?
The Gigantic Collection of Star Trek Minutiae
--Jonah
------------------
"It's obvious I'm dealing with a moron..."
--Col. Edwards, ROBOTECH
Perhaps the head on the main bridge has large-diameter plumbing suitable for Bugomite and Ogreoid use, and enlisted crew of sufficiently small diameter are encouraged to use a "flush-down" mode of intraship transport when in a hurry, so that the turbolifts will be left free for officer use?
Timo Saloniemi
Ummm...look again. The walls may be made of flat panels, but the turbolift interiors on the original series are certainly NOT square any more than the bridge (which is also made of many flats) is.
------------------
You know, you really should keep a personal log. Why bore others needlessly?
The Gigantic Collection of Star Trek Minutiae
The Pasteur did have square turbos IIRC. There was a shot of old Picard in the turbo going to the bridge or his quarters or something and the car was most definitely rectagular. The Excelsior originally had square lifts as well. That shot of the turbo in Engineering in ST:III shows this very clearly. (Computer: "Thank you." Scotty: "Up yer shaft.")
I agree wholeheartedly about the Defiant not needing horizontal shafts. Lazy bums! Walk, it's good exercise. Plus, they take up lots of space.
------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
Then again, perhaps people just like to use this lift to access the stardrive section as rapidly as possible? The E-D blueprints show no stations between the two endpoints. Picard might have been going to the secondary hull transporters for some weird reason, perhaps to avoid the crowds or protesters rallied up by Crusher to block the doors of the primary hull transporters and to shout slogans at Picard...
Timo Saloniemi
It's been a while since I've seen "Justice" so someone will need to remind of the nuances of the plot. If it's the episode I think it is, Picard could have ordered a backup staff to the Battle Bridge in case of the need for a saucer separation. And in "Brothers," Data may have had the responsibility to bring the Battle Bridge online before heading to Main Engineering with the remainder of the command staff.
------------------
Nic: She's not a practicing lesbian. We need PRACTICING lesbians!
Me: I have a camcorder.
Nic: But no lesbians.
Me: Ahhh... no.
Nic: DAMN IT MAN! WE NEED LESBIANS! LOTS AND LOTS OF LESBIANS!
ICQ Conversation From January 23, 2001.