This is topic In defense of sector 001, the Sol system in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/1178.html

Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
Anyone care to speculate on just how and with what the Sol system is defended? We know of the Mars Defense Perimeter, but that can't be just it, the coverage is too small and from what we've seen the performance isn't that great either. They mentioned planetary defenses in "Paradise Lost", but didn't go into great details on that (there was certainly nothing shown attacking the Borg cube in Earth orbit in "BoBW"). There should be a Spacedock in orbit, too, but no one is positive on how well those things are armed (SFB aside).

Starfleet was only able to rally 40 ships during the first Borg incursion as a final defense line, and basically no organized defense effort from the point the Borg cube entered Federation space to when it reached Wolf 359 (mind you that could be attributed to spetacularly stupid fleet deployment). The number of ships in system seems to be rather small, despite it being the biggest collection of Starfleet orbital facilities besides maybe Antares. You only had a single ship chasing after Harry in that alternate reality eps of VOY, I think Quark ran into a Nebula in orbit of Earth in "Little Green Man", and while the Lakota and the Defiant was busy creaming eachother, no other ships can along to say "hey, what the heck are you guys doing?"

Then there's the Breen attack on Starfleet HQ. Wyomn (sp?) or Damar kept saying how it's a pitty they lost so many ships, making it sound like they lost a lot of ships. So Starfleet must have mustered up a significant force to defend Earth, but still letting enough Breen ships getting past to crack the defenses around Starfleet HQ. However we're not quite sure just how many Breen ships there were, and how far they got into Federation space before they were detected and engaged.

I think I'm confusing myself here.

------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
I would guess Earth was rather poorly defended up until TBoBW. After the Borg cube made it all the way there, I'm sure that scared the shit out of everyone. They would have increased the defenses at that point. Also, the defenses would have been increased more during wartime, and even more after Betazed was taken (as mentioned, it put the Dominion within striking distance of Earth). Thus, the reason the Breen attack was defended against fairly well (if not totally effectively...).

------------------
"Although, from what I understand, having travelled around the Mid-west quite a bit, apparently Jesus is coming, so I guess the choice now is we should decide whether we should spit or swallow."
-Maynard James Keenan
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I keep a stout branch of oak beside my nightstand.

------------------
OH NO< THE OLD MAN WALKS HIS GREEN DOG THAT SHOTS PINBALLS!~!!!
--
Jeff K
****
Read three (three!) chapters of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet" and nothing at all will happen.


 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
Wasn't that the subject of a King Missile song?

------------------
"I'm beginning to think that there'll be NO forced mating at ALL!" --Professor Hubert T. Farnsworth
 


Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
I can just imagine the NRA leading a rally in San Francisco as the Breen ships fly overhead.

"Okay ... ready ... aim ... FIRE!"

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 8.32 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with seven eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
***
"I think this reason why girls don't do well on multiple choice tests goes all the way back to the Bible, all the way back to Genesis, Adam and Eve. God said, 'All right, Eve, multiple choice or multiple orgasms, what's it going to be?' We all know what was chosen" - Rush Limbaugh, Feb. 23, 1994.



 


Posted by Lee (Member # 393) on :
 
And the thing beside Sol's nightstand is his bed. Now at last he confirms the rumours himself!8)

------------------
"It strikes me that there are enough episodes of the Simpsons that people could speak entirely in Simpsonese, using references from the show to explain or describe an endless series of situations. Nelson and Apu . . . at Tinagra.

But now I�ve brought Star Trek into it again, haven�t I. Sorry."

- James Lileks, 09/04/2001
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Yes! We have cleverly trapped him, using our cunning plan that we thought up, and got David to do, using telepathy and drugs!

We (I) rulez! Dude.

------------------
You know, when Comedy Central asked us to do a Thanksgiving episode, the first thought that went through my mind was, "Boy, I'd like to have sex with Jennifer Aniston."
-Trey Parker, co-creator of South Park
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I don't even attempt to sound funny today... I'll just argue with a droning voice that I don't think Earth was ever very poorly defended.

When we saw invasions of Earth, the parties responsible were superpowerful. V'Ger was said to have shut down Earth's planetary defence systems, so we never got to see what those systems were. The Whale Probe did the same. The Borg silenced a Jupiter Outpost with a high double-digit number, so perhaps there were a hundred or more such outposts to be silenced; it blasted apart three defence vessels, so perhaps there were dozens to be blasted. Most of the Borg blasting was done off screen, and when the Enterprise arrived, it is possible that significant amounts of defence hardware had already been destroyed (although we didn't see the flotsam when we zoomed in on the Cube in orbit - perhaps it had burned up in the atmosphere already, in the vicinity of the volume we saw?).

When the Lakota fought the Defiant, there was no clear indication that this was anywhere near Earth. In fact, Leyton would probably have wanted to stop the intruder as far away from Earth as possible, and since the Defiant wasn't running under cloak (treaty forbidding, plus high warp and cloaks don't mix), a distant intercept was relatively simple to set up.

As for what Earth could have in its protection, I just learned that "Whom Gods Destroy" dialogue confirms the existence of planet-covering shields (thanks, Graham!). So that's one "must" item. Then perhaps orbital weapon platforms (the things we see blinking out on the tactical display in TMP when V'Ger makes its move), armed with phasers and torpedoes. Probably swarms of very small local defence ships, but these wouldn't be deployed in battles where they wouldn't make any difference (for example, sending a "Peregrine" interceptor against a Borg Cube, even in swarms, would be futile).

Surface-mounted torpedo launchers seem possible as well (perhaps these would be considered "missile" launchers in this case), as do surface-mounted high-power beam weapons. We already know there are stockpiles of infantry weapons to counter an invasion ("Homefront"); there might be heavier surface-fighting gear as well, and local shields, and possibly transporter-based weapons using the hardwired, unjammable commercial transporter nets that probably cover the planet.

Starships might not be available in great numbers in low orbit - more probably, these would mostly flock around Mars (and in the Whale Probe attack be paralyzed there, in the Borg one be already sent to Wolf 359 - only in TMP was it explicitly stated that there were no other starships present in the Sol system). There might even be a treaty prohibiting Starfleet from deploying starship permanently near Earth, like a Roman general was forbidden from taking his legions to Rome proper...

Also, I suspect this "Mars defence perimeter" was only intended to protect Mars, not the system in general. The Cube simply took a scenic route, visiting ALL the outer military installations in the system (Jupiter was mentioned, Saturn and Mars were shown) and blasting to bits their local defence perimeters before proceeding to Earth. That way, the Cube could protect its rear during the actual assimilation process, by preemptively eliminating even the futilest pieces of resistance remaining in the system.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Actually, I don't think Earth, itself is too terribly defended - i.e. orbital platform weapons etc. etc. etc.

1. As mentioned there hadn't been much penetrating the Feds all the way to Earth for a long time until the Borg.

2. As the whole 'story' behind Homefront/Paradise Lost attests too, Earth is a Paradise, but what sort of a paradise is it when you have armed guards roaming the streets. I feel this might apply to the defence of the planet too... Earth wouldn't be Earth, if it were some heavily fortified installation. I assume this would be the same for other 'core worlds'.

------------------
Homer: I'm gonna miss Springfield. This town's been awfully good to us.
Bart: No, it hasn't, Dad. That's why we're leaving.
Homer: Oh, yeah. [pokes his head out the window] So long, Stinktown!
 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
I can't imagine there being any ground-based weapons installations on Earth - just doesn't fit into the trek ideology (alledged paradise).

Orbiting Weapons platforms make the most sense.

------------------
At that point, McDonald fired his gun three times in the air to emphasize his point. The crowd, estimated at 350,000, loudly cheered the new candidate.

"Let me make this clear: I am the law! I am your ruler! And you will have fries with that, motherf*cker!"


 


Posted by Starship Freak (Member # 293) on :
 
I agree on the idea of not having surface weapons-installations on inhabited planets. But my reason is rather based on something else then star trek ideology. In case of an attack, these weapons will be targeted, with potentially devastating results. It makes much more sense to have orbital fortresses. The only instance surface installations make sense is on uninhabited worlds, such as moons or asteroids.

------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"


 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
Hmm.

Phaser batteries and torpedo launching arrays on orbit - around the Moon as well, seeing as it's a colony.

Ditto for Mars (colony and Utopia Planetia).

"Mars Defense Perimeter" = last line of defense. Villains cross it? Shit thyself.

I'd like to think that all the large moons in the solar system would have some military capabilities, but what's the point?

I mean, unless they've long-range assault launching capabilites (which I'd say Utopia is the only one remotely able to pull it off - manpower, starship support, etc), they're of no use to anyone.

Say someone attacks Earth - the only way places like Io or Callisto would be able to make a difference would be
a) they had assault launching capabilities

b) the attacking ships "island-hopped" from one planet to the next, pushing back the Fed defensive line

c) all the planetoids with guns were aligned just so that they coincided perfectly with the attackers route (cha-ha).

d) they had missile-launcher arrays that could be plunged into large (invasion-sized) fleets - missiles would be too slow to be used effectively against small numbers of ships - a few decent yield M/AM explosions within a fleet would decimate a small one, or demoralize a large one.

------------------
At that point, McDonald fired his gun three times in the air to emphasize his point. The crowd, estimated at 350,000, loudly cheered the new candidate.

"Let me make this clear: I am the law! I am your ruler! And you will have fries with that, motherf*cker!"


 


Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
Therefore, the best defense system has to be:
- self-propelled
- self-navigating

ie: Starships. Maybe the Sabre-class ships are from the defense fleet (Sol Station). Since they are small (around the size of the Defiant?) - it would seem to make sense.

------------------
Faster than light - no left or right.
 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
The best defense system, Phyle, yes.

But I'd consider these planetoid arrays/platforms as being absolutely last-resort things, to be used when interception had failed to the point of disaster.

Look at it this way:

I reckon that the only reason that the Romulans/Cardassians were able to hammer the planet so quickly was because they were unopposed during the initial attack (quickly rectified ).

Now the Breen either
1. Decloaked, got a few shots in, and were decimated, or
2. (no cloaks) Warped in from various vectors, dropped to impulse somewhere, were intercepted but some got through to straffe ST Headquarters once or twice before getting atomized.
More I think of it, the less likely 2. seems - they had to have had cloaks.

Blast - all this had a point.

oh yeah - Starships alone are insufficient for a determined enemy.
Too many enemy ships vs. not having enough => supplement them with unmanned platforms etc etc.

------------------
At that point, McDonald fired his gun three times in the air to emphasize his point. The crowd, estimated at 350,000, loudly cheered the new candidate.

"Let me make this clear: I am the law! I am your ruler! And you will have fries with that, motherf*cker!"


 


Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
the cardassian orbital weapon installations were pretty effective in repelling an assualt---except for that power transfer design flaw which i think can;t be helped...
 
Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
and most planets i think have some kind of planetary sheild
at least to scamble transporters from beaming down troops or a doomsday bomb.
 
Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
I agree, a shield powerful to protect an entire planet from blast/radiation is not believable - even the one in TOS was only mentioned as making transport difficult.

Having seen no evidence of orbital defenses on Earth, I think we are forced to assume either lunar-based (torpedo-launchers or interceptors), or system-based (Sabre fleet?). If there had been orbital weapons, we would have seen them taking out some of the aforementioned hostile vessels.

Also, one of the best forms of defense is early information. I'd assume that the Solar system's sensor net is fairly tight (except for cloaked ships). An interceptor task force could be vectored onto any threat fairly efficiently. And it would make more sense to station the interceptors as close to the target as possible (lunar orbit?).

------------------
Faster than light - no left or right.
 


Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
Something as important as the Sol system? I'd hope it'd have its own tachyon detection network.

------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I agree with the logic of not placing heavy defences on Earth's surface. Surface-mounted antiship rayguns simply happened to be an established part of treknology (from "Return to Grace" at least, but also from things like "A Taste of Armageddon"), so I wanted to include them. Perhaps frontier worlds are more likely to utilize such systems than good old Earth.

As for the Cardassian/Romulan and Breen attacks, I think they could be downplayed a bit if necessary. The former could have destroyed 30% of its designated target area, not of the entire surface (the dialogue and visuals certainly allow for this, and such rate of destruction would also better fit the initial estimates of how long it would take to melt the planet to slag). The latter attack could have lasted for two seconds, or two hours, and involved a rapid delivery of a superior weapon, or a long and bloody battle where a few shots got through. I tend towards the latter, considering that the destruction seemed so sporadic and minor (pillars of smoke from various spots in the city, a damaged HQ building instead of a smoking crater, a severed instead of vaporized Golden Gate bridge).

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
What were the Romulans' initial estimates, Timo? I can't recall.
Besides, I'm fairly sure the Tac officer on the Warbird said "30% of the planet's crust destroyed in opening volley".

The Dominion has used ground-based beam weapons as well - 'Once More Unto The Breach' - they seemed pretty effective to me.

I think we would have heard about/seen Earth's orbital weapons by now, if they existed at all.

FOrce:
The Chin'Toka assault fleet was an invasion force, not one committed to nuking the planet. They had to take out all forms of the planet's defensive system before they could start landing troops on it.

If they wanted the planet wiped out, a simple missile launch from a planetary site or an attack � la 'For The Uniform' would be much easier.

David:
It took a heap of Starships, fixed in position, to maintain the tachyon grid in 'Redemption' - I'd balk at the logisitcal necessities for one required to cover the Solar System from all angles!

------------------
At that point, McDonald fired his gun three times in the air to emphasize his point. The crowd, estimated at 350,000, loudly cheered the new candidate.

"Let me make this clear: I am the law! I am your ruler! And you will have fries with that, motherf*cker!"


 


Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
It "only" took 60 starships, most of them in dubious conditions. You can always have dedicated unmanned platforms backed up by patrols of runabout-sized craft. I guess the grid didn't exist though, considering the Defiant sneaked into Sol using cloak in one episode. Shame on who ever devised the defenses around Sol.

------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

 


Posted by TheF0rce (Member # 533) on :
 
i've wondered about the effectiveness of the cardassian platforms---they seemed pretty effective considering we did not see any evidence a single platform got destroyed once they were activated.
and they tore apart the alliance fleet--even if the alliance fleet wanted to destroy the planet-throw up a sophisticated dominion tachyon net and nothing is gonna get even close to the planet.


but it also must be costly to set up such a system
even though they were unmanned.

of course people argue the cardassains were idiots to have them all use the same power source that was incredibly not hard to find.
why didn't each platform have their own generator? people asked....

i think giving each generator would weaken the platforms. each will have weaker shields due to their small generator...whereas the main generator could have supplied alot of power to a single platforms under attack and not waste power to ones that weren't.

plus giving a platform each their own generator would have been a waste of resources.

but starleet deffinately should improve upon this tech.
 


Posted by Evolved (Member # 389) on :
 
Speaking of those Cardassian platforms, remember when the USS Galaxy gets hit by one, and we some of the lower hull ripped off?

Just where were the shields on that ship?

BTW, we do know a little about Earth's global defense from that map in "Paradise Lost" showing most of the major cities connected through routes. On the other hand, the fact there are no reliable back-ups for the power grids employed by Earth seem a little to sloppy for a major homeworld.

------------------
Ace

"Objects in mirror are closer than they appear."


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Probably the Cardassians were short on both resources and time when constructing the orbital defences of Chin'toka. IIRC, the system had recently been virtually emptied of starships in preparation of an offensive, and Damar was making G�ring-style unfounded promises about how he could still protect the system. These orbital platforms were being constructed, but they were not ready yet. And when time ran out, Damar's forces probably simply omitted the power sources and instead opted for a makeshift centralized power source. A longer preparation time would have allowed for a more redundant and durable network.

About the Defiant penetrating Earth's surveillance nets: I don't think she ever did that. In "Paradise Lost", she was heading towards Earth at high speed, uncloaked, when she was intercepted by the Lakota in what looked like deep space. Worf decided it was too late to cloak since the Lakota was already firing. A battle ensued, the Lakota capitulated, and both ships then sailed to Earth openly and without cloaking.

In "The Die is Cast", the Romulans estimated they'd destroy the planet's crust in an hour, and the mantle in five after that. What they ended up with was 30% of the crust destroyed with initial volley. But the wording (which I have to check once again) did NOT explicitly claim it was 30% of the WHOLE planet (although this may have been the writers' intention). The word "planet" was not used in the sentence.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Maybe 30% of the chosen target area.

------------------
Don't kill me, I'm charming!

 


Posted by Mikey T (Member # 144) on :
 
I thought that there was a mention of ground based defensive weapons in either "Paradise Lost" or "Homefront" when I watched. And speaking of orbiting weapons platforms, have we ever seen anything orbit Earth in recent episodes? Where are the orbital habitats or Earth Station McKinley? Author, Author somewhat ruined the station's position when Barcley gave them a view of Earth from McKinley's position.

------------------
"When I said to get involved in the gay community, I didn't mean to sleep with everyone in it."
Michael_T
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I'm not sure if "Homefront/Paradise Lost" spoke of anything beyond infantry weapons on Earth surface...

But having the orbit of Earth be empty is easy enough to explain. It's simply that all the stuff in orbit is so far away from all the other stuff that it cannot be seen. Only when two pieces of hardware are functionally connected (like the "orbital office" and its apparently associated dock facilities in TMP, with all those workbees shuttling in between) will they be close enough to each other to be seen with naked eye.

If Earth has orbital weapon platforms, they are probably higher up than the orbits we have visited, and more distributed than the corresponding systems of Chin'toka or Cardassia Prime, owing to greater range, better targeting systems, and higher reliance on the power of diplomacy and starship deterrence... We'd then not see the platforms, unless we saw an actual attack and the platforms started firing.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
Place planet-based energy/torpedo weapons on Luna's poles, and you have all threat axis covered neatly.

And you don't destroy a spotted owl's habitat when the thing goes BOOM.

------------------
Faster than light - no left or right.
 


Posted by Toadkiller (Member # 425) on :
 
Another reason we might not see anything in orbit - it seems that run-of-the-mill shields should be enough to "cloak" something enough to not be seen with the naked eye. Simply set the shields to absorb enough ambient light to keep the ship/station/whatever from being "shiny" and it is basically invisible - at least from any significant distance. Black on black.

I'm 75%+ sure that TOS references getting shields up as = to becoming invisible to primitive cultures. I'd think this sort of capability would be crucial for sneaking in to look at pre-warp civilizations and such - same idea would absorb and defeat radar/laser based detection systems.

The big bonus for Earth would be that if all the various orbital "suburbs" aren't visible then you can still have your nice night sky.

------------------
TK


 


Posted by Treknophyle (Member # 509) on :
 
And thus violate the Treaty of Algernon

------------------
Faster than light - no left or right.
 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
Not really. Cloaks are impervious to most types of sensors. What the Lord of Toadkiller Hall is saying is that one could conceivably adjust one's shield to warp visible light around a ship. But normal sensors could still tell if it was there - I mean, how many binocular-equipped look-outs do we see in ST, really?

Not that I agree with the idea - I think it's daft to be quite honest - but I'm just being annoying.

------------------
At that point, McDonald fired his gun three times in the air to emphasize his point. The crowd, estimated at 350,000, loudly cheered the new candidate.

"Let me make this clear: I am the law! I am your ruler! And you will have fries with that, motherf*cker!"


 


Posted by Toadkiller (Member # 425) on :
 
No light warping required. Part of the current day stealth fighter's "stealthyness" is from radar absorbing materials on the plane's skin. The radar beams (or laser) hit the plane and are absorbed (transfering a small amount of heat) instead of being reflected back to the radar's receiver. Also angles of the hull reflect what isn't absorbed in other directions.

Now, ST shields seem to have the implied capability of absorbing nearly all energy in a given EM wavelength spread - if they didn't then a "simple" laser would be able to carve up the ship. If they can absorb laser energy then they should be able to absorb the visible light shining on them from the sun, at least enough to not be visible to the naked eye/telescope/radar receiver. The flaw in this is heat - the starship would need some way to radiate the heat absorbed, but ST ships don't ever seem to worry about physics so that shouldn't be a problem.

The Romulans wouldn't care, as the ship isn't "cloaked" it just isn't shiny. If you came along side you'd simply see a big black blob where the ship was...

Of course something else they could steal from the stealth fighter is the idea of painting their ships black. Because, see, the thing about space is....

Of course this is all somewhat off the thread's topic.

------------------
TK


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
The Enterprise vanished from radar screens in "Tomorrow is Yesterday" but the pilot could see the ship with the naked eye.

I think.

------------------
OH NO< THE OLD MAN WALKS HIS GREEN DOG THAT SHOTS PINBALLS!~!!!
--
Jeff K
****
Read three (three!) chapters of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet" and nothing at all will happen.


 


Posted by David Templar (Member # 580) on :
 
About the Defiant penetrating Earth's surveillance nets: I don't think she ever did that.
---
It was that episode where Sisko, Bashir, and Dax all travel back in time and Sisko gets mistaken for some Bell guy.

------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
"Past Tense"? Interesting - I didn't remember anything like that. Why would the Defiant penetrate sensor nets, if her mission was just to ferry Sisko and friends to a conference? And after Sisko traveled to the past and got the real Bell killed, the sensor nets of Earth ceased to exist. Oh, well - have to rewatch. (It's well worth a rewatch in any case...)

In addition to "Tomorrow is Yesterday", at least TOS "Assignment: Earth" and VOY "Future's End" featured starships becoming invisible to Earth's radar systems by using their standard shields in some special mode. I agree that such partial cloaking is probably well outside the parameters of the Algeron treaty - as are the various holographic countermeasures we've seen in "Who Watches the Watchers" or "Basics" etc. Only "complete" cloaks count as illegal.

And Earth would partially cloak its orbital platforms anyway (paint them black or something) to protect the said spotted owl. Thousands of such platforms on the sky would ruin the starscape if they reflected sunlight...

Timo Saloniemi
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3