This is topic Spruance-class Cargo Transport in forum Designs, Artwork, & Creativity at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/7/167.html

Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Kind of odd design I agree. But then again, cargo transports/tankers never have looked pretty in the past.

Spruance-class Cargo Transport

Have questions or comments please ask and give.

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink

[This message has been edited by Hobbes (edited September 15, 1999).]
 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
I'm sceptical of torp launchers on a transport. And what's the launch date of the class? Did I miss it or haven't your specified one? Other than that, a nice, ugly transport.

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
I think it looks pretty good, actually.

------------------
Frank's Home Page - free pencil with every visit!
 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Another nitpick: the picture says Type 7 Phasers but the text says Type 8.

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Looks nice

------------------
A-"Dippidy Doo." Q-"What forms on your dippity early in the morning?"--Johnny Carson



 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Phaser type corrected. In my personal Star Trek universe all Federation/Starfleet operated vessel require minor defensive capabilities. Especially with the Dominion war. As for the year is was launched, oh say around 2372 was when the first Spruance-class vessel was launched.

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink
 


Posted by Gaseous Anomaly (Member # 114) on :
 
Odd. Freaky. Different.
I like it a lot.

Anything related to the Oberth class, and I'm happy.

------------------
The unexplained phenomenon that crippled the U.S.S. Unimpeachable --
Gaseous Anomaly...
What anomalises gaseously.


 


Posted by Epoch (Member # 136) on :
 
Love it. Looks good.

------------------
If you need it I can build it. Just as long as there is a box of junk for me to use.



 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
I'm glad you all like.

The registry prefix by the way, NCT stands for Federation Cargo Transport. The "N" I believe does stand for Federation, since Federation vessels mostly start with "N"-NCC, NX, NAR. I didn't mention that on the page.

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink - Yet another site based on the popularity of starships.
 


Posted by Sunspot (Member # 77) on :
 
Actually, I did some looking into the meanings of "NCC" a few years back. "NCC" means "Naval Construction Code" or "Naval Constuction Contract".

Makes sense, since the numbers are given out in the order the ships are contracted to be built.

------------------
"She's never letting me forget, I've always been an idiot"
-The Verve Pipe



 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
I believe that explanation is a fannish one, however, not necessarily an official one.

Naval Cutie Carrier.

------------------
"We shall not yield to you, nor to any man." -- Freak, The Mighty.

 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Making NCC an acronym is fine when that's all you have. (Though why they'd be naval is beyond me.) But it falls apart when we toss other prefixes into the mix. I'd have to agree with the N=UFP, CC=Starfleet, X=experimental (or prototype) and so on, scheme.

------------------
"Recombination, then Viacom; Safeway."
--
Soul Coughing
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Registry prefixes, possible entry for the SWDAO page Frank?

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink - Yet another site based on the popularity of starships.
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Perhaps, although there's really no evidence for anything either way. Feel free to write an entry, though.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Yes, I routinely run any car with Canadian plates off the road. It makes it easier to yank them out, blind them, and put them to work in my underground salt mine." - Simon Sizer
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
The Spruance-class page has been updated with new information.

Frank: I wouldn't mind trying to write something about starship registry prefixes, I tend to agree with Sol's assement-"N=UFP, CC=Starfleet, X=experimental". I don't believe that NCC is an acromyn, and if by chance it were, I doubt the "N" would stand for Naval.

------------------
"Let's make sure that history never forgets the name...Enterprise."
Federation Starship Datalink - Yet another site based on the popularity of starships.
 


Posted by Sunspot (Member # 77) on :
 
Definition

With a few alterations to make it fit with the 24th Century, the definition works.

------------------
�T� eres que lo como!
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Why couldn't it be Naval? After all, there is the Imperial Navy...

------------------
This post will self destruct in 10 seconds

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3