This is topic chart in forum Designs, Artwork, & Creativity at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/7/219.html

Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Don't you hate it when you loose work you spent time on... I just lost a final - more detailed diagram of the Challenger class for UP3... (see other thread). Oh well.

Anyway here is something I did... its a chart - of starships - shillouettes... I remember seeing a TOS ship shillouette - with a heap of strange starships on it from TOS and the TOS movies... a friend had it. I think it was either from FASA or Starship Battles!?!

anyway - seeing as we don't have diagrams that all look the same - I went and did a shillouette chart similar to that FASA?? Brown and White chart...

anyway here it is...

Chart

Andrew.

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.

[This message has been edited by Fabrux (edited November 14, 1999).]
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
yeah Peregine is spelt with an e.

Andrew

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Akira is too big, Niagara design is non-canon, etc. etc. etc.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Any... GOOD aspects Frank!?!

anyway... Niagra I included cause... y'know people around here I think have begun to accept her and the Freedom with open arms...

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
The Freedom has a valid basis, though, but the Niagara does not.

But, the chart is...uh...comprehensive.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"We've got some new songs here that are not even on the MP3 thing. They're not available in any format, except of course the bootlegs that seem to proliferate all through our audience, as we watch people lip-synch along to songs that HAVEN'T BEEN RELEASED! DAMN YOU!" - John Linnell
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
Sure is. And takes a long time to load.... In the future, let's save thread loading time by linking huge images like that, 'kay?

------------------
Fabrux's Starship Page

"Dream not of today"
-Night blessing of the Yash-El
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Frank: If they had a Freedom model to make their diagram from, what makes you thin they didn't also have the Niagara (or a picture of it, anyway)?

------------------
"Alright, so it's impossible. How long will it take?"
-Commander Adams, Forbidden Planet
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Sorry Fab

Oh all the ships - i.e. length etc. except the Freedom, Niagra, Nova, New Orleans, Cheyenne, Challenger, Sydney, Curry, Centaur, Prometheus and Yeager were originally from a chart done by Adam Hienb*** SP?? aka the Vorlon - from a few months ago... I just made them all shillouettes and added the other ships... i.e. they were the scans from the encyc - but they were his measurements - I just used it as a basis for the chart...

oh and it was done on the quick...

and yes I wanted it to be as 'comprehensive' as possible cause there is NEVER a comprehensive chart around...

thanks Frank

Andrew

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
TSN: Where would they get an Ambassador model to kitbash?

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Stuff" - Nobody
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Theory - maybe the practice model they build like the one for the New Orleans... or maybe another ship from the same mould!?!

------------------
Ralph: Um, Miss Hoover? There's a dog in the vent.
Hoover: Ralph, remember the time you said Snagglepuss was outside?
Ralph: He was going to the bathroom.
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
My trust into the Fact Files schematics has been compromised recently when I saw the Sydney schematic that was pretty inaccurate, although nice pictures of the ship were available. I assume that only the basic structure of the real Niagara looks as depicted, maybe there are no Ambassador components used at all. I also wonder what the saucer hull of the Freedom class is made of. It's obviously a far more extensive modification of the Galaxy class saucer than it is on the New Orleans and the Cheyenne. The same could apply to the Niagara.

------------------
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way."
A somewhat different Janeway in VOY: "Living Witness"
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Brown_supahero (Member # 83) on :
 
The Niagara is widely used. Should we consider this images in a category between Canon and FF. I shall call it an acceptable design

------------------
Ruff Ryders' first space Hero
And the new owner of the 'Homeboyz in Outerspace' Hooptie
Space Ships

 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Andrew: Adam's last name is spelled "Heinbuch", if you were wanting to know...

------------------
"Alright, so it's impossible. How long will it take?"
-Commander Adams, Forbidden Planet
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
A rather morbid thought just struck me:

1) "Yesterday's Enterprise" precedes "Best of Both Worlds". (duh!)

2) By "Second Chances" and "Emissary", the model already sports an altered secondary hull, with the unlikely modification of new stern contours that cannot be the result of gluing in more parts.

The two-part question now goes: does "Data's Day" explicitly show new footage on the Ambassador model? If it does, are the ramscoops shuttered (this is the easiest way to distinguish between the E-C and Yamaguchi configs)? I haven't seen the ep, so I wouldn't know.

If the answer is yes to the former, no to the latter, I feel relieved. If the answer is yes to both, then I think I have solid if circumstantial evidence of navicide to present to the court!

If the secondary hull of the Ambassador really changes between "Yesterday's Enterprise" and "Data's Day", with no new footage of the Ambassador model seen in between and no appearance of the Ambassador during "BoBW"... Isn't the logical conclusion then that the modelmakers gutted the E-C model for spare parts to be used in "BoBW", then reassembled it using a new mold of the secondary hull (the original having been lost when some fan stole the prop for USS Princeton - oh, how I envy that putative bastard!)?

I ask the jury, isn't it rather unlikely that the secondary hull of the Ambassador model would receive new contours just because the modelmakers *felt* like re-casting the whole major component in a different shape? Isn't it a *strange coincidence* that this type of ship disappears from Starfleet use for a while, and suddenly the modelmakers are filing and puttying and cutting and welding their model to make the primary hull to fit into the secondary one "again"? Ladies and gentlemen, I say there can be only one conclusion - that a horrible crime of mutilation has taken place, and the severed lower body of the victim is now languishing with three, I repeat, THREE nacelles forcibly bolted onto it without consent or mercy.

I now give the podium to my honored opponent, Timo.

Thanks, Timo. Ahem, your honor, I only ask this: can available starship components from the time of filming of "BoBW", more specifically saucer halves and Galaxy-style nacelles, be correctly matched to the secondary hull of the Ambassador photographic model? If not, I suggest that charges be dropped at once. Also consider this: if a component of a *photographic model* was used to create a ship, why did we never see it featured prominently on screen in "BoBW"? With these questions, I rest my case.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Come again?
 
Posted by bear (Member # 124) on :
 
I think it would be interesting to allow the forum to come up with a more stylized version of the Niagara. Something bridging look and feel of the Ambassador and Galaxy commonents in the same configuration of the fact files.

Thoughts?

------------------
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/9268/index.html

[This message has been edited by bear (edited November 16, 1999).]
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Umm, forget about the above, please...

But seriously, forks, does anybody remember whether the Ambassador in "Data's Day" was the old E-C model or the new Yamaguchi one? That is, did it have narrow-slit ramscoops or full hemispheres? Did it have a round thingamabob at the center of the nav deflector dish, or just an uncluttered dish? Or did TPTB just recycle old footage from "Yesterday's Enterprise", complete with the battle damage and all?

Timo Saloniemi
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3