This is topic First image of Harrison Ford in Indy 4 in forum General Sci-Fi at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/8/1131.html

Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
Doesn't look half bad for an old fart! [Smile]

http://www.theraider.net/news/fullstory_indy4.php?id=223
 
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Cate Blanchett... Nice!

I can't believe it's been that long since Last Crusade came out, but I'm so glad this movie is finally getting made. They say it takes place in the 50's... how does that line up with the other three? I can't remember. Obviously, that means no Nazis.

Any clues as to what the subject is?
 
Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
Raiders was set in 1936.

Temple was identified onscreen as being set in 1935, which would make it a prequel, though historical comments in the film about the Japanese bombing Shanghai would make more sense if it was rather a year later, in '37.

Crusade was set in '38.

There really isn't much of anything known about the story at this point; most of the rumors that have gone around originated with previous, rejected scripts.

-MMoM [Big Grin]
 
Posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim (Member # 646) on :
 
Uh, scratch what I said about the bombing of Shanghai. Although the Japanese did bomb the city in 1937, it seems that they had first done so in 1932. Besides, if the film were set in '37, the second Sino-Japanese War would be an ongoing conflict and the city would be under military occupation.

I'm glad to be wrong, as it eliminates a perceived continuity error! [Big Grin]

Still doesn't explain why Indy says he doesn't believe in magic in Raiders, though, given his up-close-and-personal experience with it in Temple... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
There was no magic. Nothing there that can't be explained away by science.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
I don't know. Ripping people's hearts out and drug induced hypnosis is one thing, funky rocks that spontaneously glow white hot when you chant at them is something else.

Perhaps he was lying?
Remember he gave a class in archaeology where he went on about how X never marks the spot?
 
Posted by B.J. (Member # 858) on :
 
No Nazis, perhaps. Maybe some "ex"-Nazis? Or perhaps run-ins with Commies?

Shia LaBeouf seems to be getting a lot of big-screen time recently.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aban Rune:
Cate Blanchett... Nice!

I can't believe it's been that long since Last Crusade came out, but I'm so glad this movie is finally getting made. They say it takes place in the 50's... how does that line up with the other three? I can't remember. Obviously, that means no Nazis.

Any clues as to what the subject is?

Also nice (but for a TOTALLY different reason) John Hurt as Abner Ravenwood and possibly the return of Karen Allen!
 
Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Ooooohhh... sweet.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
Take that with a grain of salt mind you, as it comes from the likes of IMDB & Dark Horizons.
 
Posted by Saltah'na (Member # 33) on :
 
Too bad Sean Connery isn't in this one. Would be interesting, three generations of Jones.... there would certainly be a lot of banter in that respect.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3