This is topic $$ DW 5x07 Amy's Choice $$ in forum General Sci-Fi at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/8/1413.html

Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Any thoughts? Thought it was a good episode. I preferred it over the Vampire ep.

I'm an episode behind at the moment.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
I admit my knowledge of Who continuity is extremely vague, wasn't there already an "evil Doctor" type character? Not that I mind, it was fun seeing what the Doctor actually thinks of himself.
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
Yeah, "Only one person could hate me as much as you do." (Which made me think it was the Master until the reveal.)
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
I didn't mean the Master (though that line made him cross my mind too) I meant that I vaguely recall there already being some type of "evil Doctor" manifestation like this Dream Lord. Not another Time Lord that happens to be a nutter, but something specifically created from or by the Doctor. I want to say it was a Pertwee story but I can't be certain.

For the record I'm glad it wasn't the Master. It's far too soon for him to crop up again. Indeed, I'd have rather they not have featured the Daleks this series either.
Wouldn't mind seeing the proper Cybermen though. That is, the ones from this universe.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
You could be thinking of the Valeyard, the personification of all that is evil in the Doctor that exists somewhere between his 12th and 13th incarnation.

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Valeyard

No, it doesn't really make much sense, to be honest. Anyway, good episode. I liked that both realities were fake, Rory is a good character (and very different from Mickey, which I worried was a character arc they were going to repeat).

I do think it's wrong though when the Doctor drives a car. He just shouldn't do that.
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
Didn't he ever drive before? When he was working for UNIT? Like a jeep or something? Maybe he was just riding in one, but I have a vague memory...
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Bessie doesn't count. I mean when he gets in a normal, every day vehicle. The Tenth Doctor did it a couple of times (after the Master took over the Earth, for isntance), and the Forth Doctor did it at least once.

It's just... he shouldn't be seen in such an ordinary, boring form of travel It's wrong.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
Well, he uses shoes to travel all the time (often at high speed) and they're about as ordinary as anything else. [Wink]

Seriously though I rather think part of the whole appeal of the Doctor is the combination of the ordinary and the bizarre. The phone box is pretty synonymous now of course, but back in the 60's when it all started those things were a pretty common sight in London, which was the whole point. Then you have his various outfits over the years which are usually a mix of the ordinary with a slightly eccentric twist (rather less than slight in the case of the bloke between Davidson & McCoy who's name escapes me.)
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
"It's just... he shouldn't be seen in such an ordinary, boring form of travel It's wrong."

You'd prefer maybe the Whomobile?

Reverend : Colin Baker is the name you're looking for.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"Then you have his various outfits over the years which are usually a mix of the ordinary with a slightly eccentric twist"

That's why Bessie was okay. A car, but an eccentric one. Stick him in a Ford Focus though and it would be all wrong. Reverend mentions shoes, and the ones worn by the 10th and 11th Doctors would probably come under the "ordinary but a touch eccentic" banner.

The Whomobile though was all wrong, in that it wasn't ordinary. It was just silly sci-fi. Same with Colin Baker's costume (and Davison's too, to an extent). They were too far into silly land.
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Certainly, the Doctor shouldn't own a Ford Focus. But, if he needs to get somewhere, and that's what's available, having him drive one for a couple minutes doesn't seem like a problem.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
I can't explain why I see it as wrong, but I do. It might be the mundane stuff that goes with car driving. To get the Tardis going he runs around like a madman. Driving a car involves putting a seatbelt on and making sure you check your mirrors before reversing. That just seems... wrong.

Note that I have no issues with buses or trains.
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
What if the car is an old junker with the parking brake on that needs six drivers? [Wink]
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
I didn't buy that handbrake line. Lots of other TARDISes make that noise, so unless all the other Time Lords are also bad drivers...
 
Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
I can't be bothered starting a new thread for this but - in the second Angels episode... Did anyone notice a little interesting segment.

Possible Spoilers $$$$$


$$

$$

$$

There's a bit just after when The Doctor and River leave Amy alone in the Forest. Then the Doctor comes up to her and tells her to start trusting her and he also gets her to try and remember what he told her when she was a little girl... Notice that he had lost his coat to the Angels and wasn't wearing it then in that scene you can just see that he's wearing it again. I may have read somewhere where someone speculated that that was the Doctor from the future and he's crossing his own timeline.

I can't remember but after I realised that and watched it again - it's SO COOL! - that there was something 'planted' in the first episode too. I think he might have gone back one more time to see Amy in the past. There was a scene (my memory is a bit foggy) where who ever says something about time since he last visited - Amy or the Doctor - it just doesn't add up. Looks like some exciting things are afoot, in the future! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
The jacket thing sounds like just a minor costuming continuity error. Which is not to say that it couldn't be intentional, but it would be very subtle, if it was.

I'm not even sure what it is that you're describing from the first episode, though.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3