Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

This topic has been moved to Designs, Artwork, & Creativity.     next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » New-orleans class MSD (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   
Author Topic: New-orleans class MSD
Lobo
Active Member
Member # 669

 - posted      Profile for Lobo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi.
I am working currently at an MSD of the New orleans class.
http://mitglied.lycos.de/mrbrown5/orleansMSD.jpg

I have a two questions about the ship:

Where is the Shuttle hangar of the ship?
And what are(/is in) these "containers" above and below of the ship?

Lobo

[ September 12, 2002, 23:16: Message edited by: Lobo ]

--------------------
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die..."

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
id say Deck 2 and 3 all the way to turbo shaft
and i would put eng on deck 8 and 9

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No one knows, and no one knows. The ship may not even have a shuttlebay, though some of us think it might be located in the extreme aft, conveniently blown away on the model. The pods could be anything, but some of us think they may contain weapons. But then, they are probably modular containers which could have just about anything inside. Heck, they could be the shuttlebays.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Akira
Member
Member # 850

 - posted      Profile for Akira     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Could they be Escape pods maybe? Maybe thats what there were refering to in the companion and TNG Tech. Manual

--------------------
Christopher
[email protected]
SR20Egg

Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Uh, in theory, sure, though that seems more than a little unlikely.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Harry
Stormwind City Guard
Member # 265

 - posted      Profile for Harry     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They're either AGT-Enterprise phaser cannons (the F4NB0Y theory, I think) or some kind of sensor/generic hi-tech stuff.

--------------------
Titan Fleet Yards | Memory Alpha

Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Obviously no one can be certain what is in those pods. I'd like to think that they're torpedo launchers, given that the NO is a frigate-type ship. Given the scale, the usual neck-mounted launcher isn't feasible, so they'd have to go somewhere else.

As for the shuttlebay, if you take a close look at the mangled aft hull, you can still see the point where the curves meet, proving that there's no bay there. (Besides, the ship was made with Galaxy-class parts, so there'd be nothing there.) However, the shuttlebay on the saucer would still be big enough to hold the appropriate complement for a smaller starship.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
one thing i would recommend to aspiring starship designers is to study real naval ships.. see how, in our seagoing vessels, certain features always land in the same place, if there are extreme differences in design (one detail on a frigate that varies vastly from a cruiser, for example), then try to understand what causes it. reverse engineer the ship and then engineer it back up and it will reveal why things are there.

our study of the damaged N.O. model has revealed that the shuttlebay must be either in the missing aft section, or in the damaged back of the saucer. we can extrapolate this because we know many ships before it had bays in the aft 2ndary hull and many ships after it have bays on the rear upper saucer.

i doubt the frigate mission profile would require three skinny shuttlebays, so i eliminate this as a possibility, even though its as good a theory as any.

To iterate: a frigate is a vessel which is smaller than a cruiser and larger than a patrol/escort vessel. a frigate may not be faster than a cruiser, but is faster (add: more maneuverable) than other ships of its size, and, while not as well armed as a cruiser, still heavily armed compared to other ships of its size. in space, i can imagine these frigates using their greater speed to be fleet escorts within friendly territory and policing outer territories. a trade off for the increased speed and weapons would be mission duration, basically these ships dont stray far from home bases as federation cruisers and explorers.

So, with this said, i could theorize the extensions as torpedo bays, or even swapped out modules that could be launchers, or if the vessel were specialized, made into tractor beams (for coast guard duties); sensor platforms/communications arrays (for listening/patrol duties); or possibly some combinatin of the possibilities, frigates are often required to be versatile, moreso than other specialized ships like escorts, corvettes or scouts. basically take all of a cruisers capabilities (speed, arms, scouting) and pack them, tightly wound, into a ship that is smaller, easier to outfit, but lacks the range and duration but gains versatility.

i think the N.O. extensions are along the lines of the Miranda rollbar or the swappable Nebula platforms: mission versatility. and probably easily swapped out.

[upon this edit, i can see that Minutiae Man and Harry beat me to this post due to my own longwindedness]

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Toadkiller
Active Member
Member # 425

 - posted      Profile for Toadkiller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can't recall how many NO's we've seen - is it only the one?

Maybe they aren't even a standard part of the ship?

--------------------
Twee bieren tevreden, zullen mijn vriend betalen.

Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i'd like to think they are, just to make the vessel have a little more character against the Galaxy and other Galaxy-like ships
Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd settle for them being semi-permanent, like the Miranda rollbar. There may be situations when the ship sails without them, but those situations are rare. There may also be missions where a different type of module is called for, but these missions are unlikely to be seen as long as the camera rides along a vessel with the mission profile of a typical Enterprise (Insert your own rationale here).

The blackened center of the forward face in these modules does suggest a "launcher" mission. The muzzles are a bit large in comparison with TOS era ones, but not too big IMHO. After all, some here are willing to believe that the Centaur was more than 300 meters long, and had even bigger launchers...

As for the definition of "frigate", perhaps the 23rd/24th century one goes "a ship that is about cruiser-sized, and pretends to be a cruiser by wearing modules, but is much less capable than a cruiser when naked". That would satisfy the fan idea that the Mirandas/Avengers are frigates, too! It would also make Springfield a frigate.

The Nebula would be excempted from the humiliating nomer because it doesn't pretend to be a cruiser by wearing modules - it pretends to be an explorer! We could invent a whole new designation for ships of Nebula type...

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Ryan McReynolds
Minor Deity
Member # 28

 - posted      Profile for Ryan McReynolds     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There could be two side-by-side circular torp tubes in each pod, if the opening is too large as is.

--------------------
Enterprise: An Online Companion

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." --Phillip K. Dick

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Johnny
Senior Member
Member # 878

 - posted      Profile for Johnny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
^ But that would make at least six torpedo tubes, isn't that a few too many for a ship this size? Even if frigates are quite well armed.

--------------------
deviantArt page | Online portfolio

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742

 - posted      Profile for Amasov Prime     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Shuttlebay: there could be a dropbay behind the rear en of the lower "tube". Or a lift ("DS9-style") between the upper tubes.

--------------------
"This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Lobo
Active Member
Member # 669

 - posted      Profile for Lobo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Update:
http://mitglied.lycos.de/mrbrown5/orleans.jpg

I will set the Shuttlehangar in the upper container and the lower container becomes a cargo container.

Lobo

--------------------
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die..."

Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   

Post New Topic  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3