This is topic DENIAL OF SERVICE in forum The Flameboard at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/714.html

Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

Man, what has the internet world comes to.

A 46 years-old internet veteran bested by a 13 years-old kids...

~sigh~
 


Posted by Tahna Los (Member # 33) on :
 
I don't think I'll buy any more Windows products after reading this. Win98 is good enough for me.
 
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
 
It seems that the modes of attack have been getting more advanced that the protections.....

"Jeez, what a worthless cop/teacher/person, getting bested by a 13 year old with a gun...."

The idea is the same, the level is different....

Then there is this kids mother, "Oh, little Johnny, oops, I mean Wicked, is soo good at doing internet attacks. Why, just this past week he's attacked grc.com and kept knocking them offline...."

Both scenarios need more perantal supervision....
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
I think there's quite a bit of differnce.

With a gun, all you need to do is aim and pull the triger.

With a computer, you need to learn how to hack, where to hack, and make your own tools to hack.

Although the kid didn't wrote his own "bots", Steve Gibson did say that he "hex edited" it, and I think that's pretty impressive for a kid his age, and terrified that he's using it for crime.
 


Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
 
Not really, I was hex-editing within the first 6 months I had my 8088 system, getting games to change icons and what not....
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Children need to learn self-discipline at an early age.

The epithet 'script kiddie' is nothing to commit a federal crime over.
 


Posted by Mucus (Member # 24) on :
 
*raises an eyebrow*
There are epithets worth committing federal crimes over? I must learn them and use them
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"I don't think I'll buy any more Windows products after reading this. Win98 is good enough for me."

Of course, it is. Just as DOS was good enough for everyone back in 1993. And Windows 95 was good enough for everyone back in 1997.

All play to you if you chose to never upgrade your system. Just don't expect it to be running much in half a dozen years.
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Well that was long, but I found it to be informative none-the-less. I'm also amazed how quickly and how much info this guy learned. I've always been interested in how hacking worked.
 
Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Well DUH! *just joking*

Steve Gibson is THE MAN when it come to internet security.

He's pretty good with software programming too, but I dought he's the absolute best when it comes to programming.

[ June 23, 2001: Message edited by: BlueElectron ]
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
The ironic part is, the kid was getting so upset over the term "script kiddie"... He is a script kiddie...
 
Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Liam: There are other OSes out there, of course.
 
Posted by akb1979 (Member # 557) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TSN:
The ironic part is, the kid was getting so upset over the term "script kiddie"... He is a script kiddie...

Hey don't you start insulting him! Next thing we know he'll do the same to Flare. What would we do then without Flare? I have a solution though;

Wicked, if you are a member of this forum - no offence was intended by TSN's comment. He was simply repeating what had already been said.

There. That should hold him off me thinks.
 


Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
 
I have a feeling that Charles and the combined talent of the other gurus here could handle a puny little sucker like this kid.
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Not necessarily. He may not know what he's doing, really, but he's got scripts to do all the work for him. I mean, look at what he managed to do to one of the premiere Internet security gurus out there. He might suck, in and of himself, but, if he's got a user-friendly enough program, it doesn't matter how dumb he is.

It's like this. Take someone who knows almost nothing about computers. Set them down at a DOS or UNIX prompt, and, sure, they won't be able to do anything. That's like a script kiddie left to his own devices. Now, set that same nearly-computer-illiterate person in front of Win98 or MacOS, and they'll be able to do a lot more. That's like a script kiddie who has access to the right scripts.
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Steve Gibson probably does have the ability to take a kid down once and for all.

But that probably require some major illegal hacking to track down all the fake detours that this kid used. Plus, even if he did find the kid, and crack his comp, he probably have to do some major damage like killing the BIOS or something, which probably he's too peaceful to carry out.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Killing the BIOS? Is that actually possible to do remotely?

And don't say yes unless you actually know it's happened. I've heard people say that hackers could, er, hack into someones computer and alter their motherboard settings so that the CPU runs really fast, and blows up. Or something. But I don't ever recall it actually happening.
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Yeah it's possible to do what you just said.

There are legal freewares out there that allow you to change setting to overclock CPU and whole bunch of stuff (changing front bus speed?). Anyway, I'm not really an expert here, so maybe someone can help you.

All a experience hacker have to do is gain total access with your comp, which is pretty easy to do with Window OS according to techno junkies that I know. Then what this hacker has to do is upload the sofeware into the hacked comp, and overclock the CPU like frinkin' 100 times. Garantee burn out in like 10 secs or something.

Or he can just wipe your registry and make you reformat the disk, which is a pain in the ass.
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
And for Omega:

No offense for any of the Techno dudes here, I'm sure you're all very talented.

But the kids did nailed Steve Gibson in the butt, and that is one hell of a achievement for a hacker. I don't really think we stand a chance against him, or rather, his hacking tools.
 


Posted by MC Infinity (Member # 531) on :
 
Yes, well, I'd like to see anyone try and get past my security, that's all.
 
Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Okey man, we're all getting a bit confuse here...

Steve Gibson's servers didn't get "HACKED", but instead, the kid bombarded his connection with billions of packets, which effectively killed his service by sucking up all his bandwidth, but his defenses were not penetrated and therefore his machines were not compremised.

Later on he worked it out with the engineer from his ISP to set up a barrier that "ignore" the packets directed at sepecifc ports, therefore eliminate the problem with the flood.

One last thing, I wouldn't issue a open chanllenge if I were you, even if you do have the abilities to best him on the field, I rather just stay quiet and conserve my energy to do more productive things.

[ June 24, 2001: Message edited by: BlueElectron ]
 


Posted by MC Infinity (Member # 531) on :
 
I guess you're right, I tested my pc at that site grc.com and I was right, I've got a friggin' fortress, nothing goes in or out without my specific permission.
And I like it that way.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"All a experience hacker have to do is gain total access with your comp, which is pretty easy to do with Window OS according to techno junkies that I know. Then what this hacker has to do is upload the sofeware into the hacked comp"

Don't you have to actually upload the software yourself? By being tricked into downloading dodgy warez, or by getting it in an e-mail attachment. I've never heard of hackers being able to just upload stuff to your computer if you're just connected, and nothing else.

"and overclock the CPU like frinkin' 100 times. Garantee burn out in like 10 secs or something."

Now, while I've heard of people saying that hackers can do this, I do not recall one instance of it actually happening. Are you sure this isn't Urban Myth?


"Or he can just wipe your registry and make you reformat the disk, which is a pain in the ass."

How does he reformat your hard drive anyway?
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
I imagine an over-overclocked processor would just shut down anyway.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Yes, I think that's true. If you clocked someone's 450mhz CPU to, say, over a gig, then I doubt the machine would get past it's POST. If it's just been overclocked a bit, then you'd notice when the computer starts up and shows a higher number.

And what about motherboards where you have to move jumpers to set bus speed and all that. Wouldn't they be immune?
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
Hackers usually trick people to download hackwares like "Netbus", or any type of "Trogin Horse". They are basically remote access programs that let you control certain functions of the hacked comps. But experienced hackers don't even need to use the hackwares, all they need is a port-scanner, find out which port is "open" and then slip in and gain TOTAL CONTROL of your comp. Then he play with things that are REALLY REALLY BAD and may make your comp EXPLODE! According to my friends of techo junkies, it can be done, but how remain a question for me.

If your over-clocked your comp in bad ways, "electromagnetic migration" or something start to set in. Basicly it slash the life expectancy of your CPU.

And I do believe if hacker over-clocked your comp too much (like 100 times), and then multi-tasks shitload of programs all at once, then it will burn out your CPU instead of a fail-safe "shut-down".

What I meant for the registry is that a hacker would mess around with it in such a way that you probably need to reformat to get your comp working again.
 


Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
And for some of your more "technical challenge" questions, I don't think I can answer them...

Maybe some of our resident techo wizards can answer them for you.
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Was this the face that launched a thousand ships
And burnt the topless towers of Illiug?
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
The FACE???
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
He was using classical literature to mock BE's spelling. That's all. :-)
 
Posted by Jay the Obscure (Member # 19) on :
 
Say my dear Sol of Troy, aren't those towers in Ilium?
 
Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
So, ZoneAlarm is better than BlackICE. Damn.

Better switch over again...
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Bartlett's has it with two L's. (Or at least I think they do. It's very, very possible I screwed up.)
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
It's one 'l'. Like "Iliad". For obvious reasons.
 
Posted by Jay the Obscure (Member # 19) on :
 
At least there is no "g".

But what the hey, I'm just funin' with ya Sol. You know full well of my poor spelling ability.
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3