This is topic The Enterprise D's Runabout in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/526.html

Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
In the TNG episode where the Ent D and a Romulan Warbird get stuck in time and Picard, Troi, Data and LaForge have to unstick them (my sincerest apologies for not remembering the name of this ep and for the lame description), there is a Danube class runabout involved that is apparently attached to the Enterprise-D. Does anyone have any info on what this runabout's name and registry might be? Was it the Danube? I know there's nothing canon unless it's in the new encyclopedia, but maybe someone has some inside info.

This also brings up another question, is it standard practice to attch runabout to larger ships now. I think it's probably a good idea although with the advent of the new super shuttles from insurrection, they may not be needed all that much longer.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
Did it occur to you that the new "super shuttles" are runabouts?

--Baloo

------------------
"It is required of every man," the Ghost returned, "that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellowmen, and travel far and wide; and if that spirit goes not forth in life, it is condemned to do so after death. It is doomed to wander through the world -- oh, woe is me! -- and witness what it cannot share, but might have shared on earth, and turned to happiness!"
-- Jacob Marley's Ghost (A Christmas Carol -- Charles Dickens)
http://members.tripod.com/~Bob_Baloo/index.htm



 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
According to 'The Star Trek Archive' neither name nor number is known.

Somehow I question this, because even a glipse of a number would probably show the difference between either NCC-7xxxx or NCC-1701-D.

I think the new 'super shuttle' is most probably a Runabout equivalant for Starship use. Larger than the average shuttle, but smaller than a Runabout.

I'll also remind you there is still a debate going whether or not the Insurrection Scout (which is the same size as a Runabout) is a solo ship or Starship based.

------------------
Life on Earth is expensive, but it does include a free annual trip around the sun!

=\V/=

 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
I was never under the impression that the runabout was attached to the E. I thought they were just using it to get someplace.

And I believe the ep was called "Timeless".

------------------
"Is he live or dead? Has he thoughts within his head?"
-Black Sabbath, "Iron Man"
 


Posted by Elim Garak (Member # 14) on :
 
Nah, that was Voyager's 100th ep. "Timescape" it is.

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
No Baloo it never occured to me. All the art material for the design calls it a shuttle. I don't think it's meant to be a new runabout.

I'm sure if we could see the number on Picard's runabout it would be an NCC number and not a NCC-1701-D/ something. All the DS9 runabouts have their own number not "DS9/2"

I hadn't heard the debate about the Scoutship having a mothership. It might explain the fact that it has no given name or class. The registry on ther hull may be the mothership's.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
The encyclopedia mentions a USS Ticonderoga at the Briar Patch. When I first found that out I considered the scout belonging to it.

I still do.

------------------
Calvin: "I'm a man of few words."
Hobbes: "Maybe if you read more, you'd have a larger vocabulary."
Federation Starship Datalink - Starship site of the new millennium.
 


Posted by Jim Phelps (Member # 102) on :
 
As far as I recall, the reg number of the runabout is visible but unreadable. I might be wrong, anyone have the episode on tape?

Boris

------------------
"Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story."

---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide


 


Posted by Elim Garak (Member # 14) on :
 
I'll check it tomorrow.

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Y'know what it probably says? "USS RIO GRANDE NCC-72452". Or one of the other DS9 runabouts. You really think they bothered to relabel the model when it wasn't going to be readable? They don't bother relabelling models when they are readable!

And "Timscape", you say? Er... Uh... That's, ah... That's what I said. You must have misheard me...

*sees his own words printed there on the screen*

D'oh!

------------------
"Is he live or dead? Has he thoughts within his head?"
-Black Sabbath, "Iron Man"
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Actually, the runabout in "Timescape" seemed to be a custom job: it did not *have* a name nor a registry! We see the part of the ship exterior that is supposed to have the name (between the red stripes at the bow flanks) as well as the parts that should feature the registry (the pylons if not the bow cutout), and those locations are empty.

I don't know why they bothered to eliminate the registries. But AFAIK all the shots of the runabout in "Timescape" were custom shots instead of DS9 footage, so perhaps the model people wanted to give the photographers greater freedom in setting up their shots. They didn't have to avoid embarrassing close-ups this way. And nobody in either team felt he had the authority to make up a number, and Okuda was out shopping or something.

Personally, I think that since Sisko gets to name his own runabouts, Picard also intended to name this one (recently aquired at the starbase) when he got back to his ship. The same logic would explain the missing name of Data's scout in "Insurrection" - the admiral was supposed to name it, but never had the time.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Hobbes: Where can I find the Ticonderoga in the Encyclopedia?

------------------
"Naomi Wildman, sub-unit of Ensign Samantha Wildman, state your intentions." (VOY: "Infinite Regress")
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
On page 672 Bernd.

------------------
Calvin: "I'm a man of few words."
Hobbes: "Maybe if you read more, you'd have a larger vocabulary."
Federation Starship Datalink - Starship site of the new millennium.
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
Timo: Is there any canon proof that Sisko names his own Runabouts? I just don't remember ever hearing it in a episode.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

 


Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
 
Yes, there is. In an episode I saw the other day, "Family Business" (I think), Kira asks Sisko what he wants to call the new runabout. He says it should be the Orinoco. Kira replies that the way they go through runabouts, it's a good thing Earth has so many rivers. . .
 
Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
I guess that might mean Picard names the shuttles!?! I guess Janeway would too...

Andrew

------------------
"Its a CLOCK!" - Sisko, "Dramatis Personae" DS9.


 


Posted by Elim Garak (Member # 14) on :
 
"Timscape"? Oh, we're not full of ourselves, are we?

------------------
Elim Garak: "Oh, it's just Garak. Plain, simple Garak. Now, good day to you, Doctor. I'm so glad to have made such an... interesting new friend today." (DS9: "Past Prologue")
 


Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
One must consider that the runabout was just on loan and not permanently attached to the Enterprise. Personally I believe that this is the case, but then again just because we never saw it again (or before) doesn't mean it wasn't there.
 
Posted by Jim Phelps (Member # 102) on :
 
There was some issue on r.a.s.t. about whether or not it would fit through the shuttlebay doors, as far as I recall.

Boris

------------------
"Wrong again. Although we want to be scientifically accurate, we've found that selection of [Photon Energy Plasma Scientifically Inaccurate as a major Star Trek format error] usually indicates a preoccupation with science and gadgetry over people and story."

---a Writers' Test from the Original Series Writer's Guide


 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Well, it got blowed up real good, so it would be hard to see again.

And there were a fair few DS9 shots used in that ep. As far as I can tell, nearly all the model shots of the runabout in DS9 (as oppossed to CGI) are filmed in such a way as to make the registry numbers in shadow or otherwise unreadable. I think the registry number on the runabout miniture is the Rio Grande's number, and they've just never bothered to change it, as it would take too much effort.

It would also explain the Rio Grande's near mutant-indestructibility.

------------------
*gasp* "The pictures...they're...coming...alive!"
-Abe Simpson, on the miracle of the moving image


 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
Hmmm, the Rio Grande may be "protected" by the Prophets. It was the vessel that Sisko used to discover the celestial temple.

The runabouts must be able to fit in the Galaxy-class main shuttlebay. After all, the Ent-D did bring the original 3 to DS9 in "Emissary".

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

[This message has been edited by Dax (edited November 30, 1999).]
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
And if they don't fit in through the aft doors, then there are always the overhead doors... Although we never see those open, to be sure.

I'd think the captains or possibly some lower-ranking officers get to name all the shuttles, and even decide on the numbers they receive. That way, the shuttle Sakharov /01 can easily be a type 7 in early TNG and type 6 in later eps, or the El-Baz can be /05 or /03 as needed. And the /13 can be a type 7 in "Coming of Age", but what seems like a TNG-era runabout in "Skin of Evil".

And I bet the workbees are named by the deck crew. And Paramount simply won't allow any of those names to be reproduced in print in any book with their logo on the back, for obvious reasons...

Timo Saloniemi

 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
First One: The Runabout you're speaking of was the Rubicon. That's the one Sisko named. I tend to ignore that line since every other piece of canon suggests that ships are named when they are commissioned.

Also, runabouts were still fairly new at this point. Consider the possibility that IF the practice of supplying some starships with runabouts was being implemented, Picard was bringing the runabout to the Ent D for the first time. They did intend to rejoin the ship so the runabout would have had to stay on board for a while at least. However, if this is the case, how did the group get to wherever they were coming back from in the first place? Did the Ent D drop them off and then leave? It wouldn't be the first time.

I also think that the hull is blank with regards to the name and rego. I watched it frame by frame and couldn't see anything.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Well as much as you might like too, we cannnot simply ignore that line (at least I can't). It could be possible that this runabout was special and signifigant in some way. Sisko could have done something special, and an admiral gave him 'special dispensation' to name it whatever he wanted.

------------------
Quark-"Stop. Or I'll disintigrate this hostage."

20th Century General-"With Your Finger?"

Quark-"With my death ray."

20th Century General-"Looks alot like a finger to me."


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Somehow I find the idea that runabouts were new to DS9 illogical. I mean, they are just bigger and badder shuttles, with no qualitative differences. Surely clumsier versions of them would have existed ever since Kirk's times? And it was just the Danube class specifically that was new...

Rewatching (ugh!) "Skin of Evil", I was intrigued by the shuttle there. You remember "shuttle 13" crashing into a rock face, with Troi aboard? The wreck exterior was portrayed by a model or prop that clearly wasn't supposed to look at all like the then standard type 7 shuttle. It had a very large stern window, a long and narrow hull, a cockpit area separated from the rest of the craft by a bulkhead and a door (admittedly, some type 7s had this as well), and two very large nacelles apparently mounted on long pylons instead of being bolted to the hull. All features that are mirrored in the Danube design.

To boot, this was one of the extremely few TNG shuttles that was in true deep-space interstellar transit, as opposed to ferrying somebody from a nearby star system to the ship or vice versa. (the only other one that comes to mind would be the type 7 in "Chain of Command", really. Or perhaps Scotty's "gift".)

This relates to two nits:

1. A legitimate difference in warp performace wrt shuttles => consistency in the way these craft are operated. It would make sense for the E-D to have one or two "runabouts" on board, since shuttles as portrayed in the TNG TM cannot go interstellar, not at warp two max.

2. (And this is really obscure!) Remember that SWDAO on "Second Sight", about the Potemkin looking like an Ambassador on the E-D monitor readout? Well, this shuttle looks like a type 7 on the monitor, even though the model never attempts to look like one. So we can now say all such screen representations are just symbolical, and the Potemkin is really an Excelsior.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
As if the above rant wasn't enough, I'll add a few lines in reply to Aban:

There seem to be three standard practices of letting people make planetside trips:

-Fly the ship in, usually at impulse, use transporters to move the people down and back up, warp out. (Normal practice for TOS, DS9 and late TNG)

-Warp the ship to the outskirts of the system, launch a shuttle, warp out, later warp back and pick up the shuttle. The shuttle usually travels at impulse. (This is used in TAS and most of early TNG)

-Send a shuttle out, crash it on a planet, fly the ship in and try to transport the people up, land the ship when this fails, take off and warp out. (This is the method preferred by VOY)

One could combine these if the target planet has a Federation presence: since shuttles are consumer goods anyway, starbases could lend them to people so that they can method-two themselves back to their ship. Or the people could leave their shuttles behind and method-one out.

I guess it all depends on how tight the schedule of the ship is. Almost invariably, ships are forced to go to impulse when entering star systems. To avoid this, the method two seems like a good idea, unless the planet is a high-risk unexplored one. And even if people were delivered by method one, it is a good idea to switch over to method two for the return trip if at all possible, to save the ship the tedious hours of impulse-crawling.

Timo Saloniemi


 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Black Night: I suppose you're right. There is evidense of special dispensation being given in starship naming. I suppose this could be the case and it's the best resolution of the problem that I've heard.

Timo: I will have to respectfully disagree with you about the differences between runabouts and shuttles. The difference in exterior design may be slight. In shape and style, yes, Danubes are big shuttles. However, in purpose and abilities, they far exceed shuttlecraft. They have swappable mission pods and those rollbar pods which give the Danubes something not found on shuttles: mission adaptablility. Shuttles are pretty much shuttles. Yes they can be adapted for specific tasks as they did in "The Outcast" to search for the missing ship. But just think how much better and safer and more efficient it would have been if Riker and the alien chickkie would have had all the resources of a small starship at their disposal.

Danubes are also designed to operate for extended periods independant of any sort of mothership. True we have never seen them as independant commands, they seem to always be attached to a starbase or (if we believe my arguement) other starships. In every way IMHO, Danubes seem to be designed as Starships, very different from shuttles in purpose.

Now I agree that Runabouts have probably been around in some form for a little while at least. However, I take Sisko's line in "Emissary" that the Enterprise had offloaded "three Runabout Class vessels" instead of Danube class, to show his unfamiliarity with this type of ship.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Well, since Aban just said a whole lot up there, I'll just summarize by saying: "uh,...yeah...what he said."

------------------
Quark-"Stop. Or I'll disintigrate this hostage."

20th Century General-"With Your Finger?"

Quark-"With my death ray."

20th Century General-"Looks alot like a finger to me."


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Uh, well... Seconded!

However, couldn't the new Enterprise-E shuttle be classified as a runabout by those criteria, despite the fact that it was labeled "shuttle" in Eaves' drawings? It did have
-(aft) torpedoes
-twin transporter pads
-internal bulkheads and corridors
-those nifty docking hatches
-out-of-proportion engines
and could have had swappable modules, too, to account for the oversized exterior and cramped interiors.

Was it ever *called* a shuttle in the movie? I won't have my tape of "Insurrection" until, you guessed, the 25th (or late 24th).

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I think it's absolutely possible that the advent and common use of the Danube class will effect the evolution of shuttle design and technology. Therefore, it's quite appropriate that shuttles are getting more and more like Danubes. Perhaps in the near future, we will see bigger and better runabouts. The Yellowstone Class from Harry's alt. future may turn out to be a new kind of runabout in our reality. I'll have to rewatch my tape to see if the new shuttle is actually called that in Insurrection, but I think it is.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by The First One (Member # 35) on :
 
Shuttle is a generic term. A shuttlecraft is a shuttle. A shuttlepod is a shuttle. A runabout is, basically, a shuttle.
 
Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Yes, it was called a shuttle. IIRC

------------------
Quark-"Stop. Or I'll disintigrate this hostage."

20th Century General-"With Your Finger?"

Quark-"With my death ray."

20th Century General-"Looks alot like a finger to me."


 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Alright, after watching Insurrection (in Widescreen) since I just bought the tape last weekend, I caught some dandy little tidbits about the Scout Ship and Shuttlecraft.

1) The "Shuttlecraft" is never refered to as such.

2) The shuttlecraft has no aft access ways visible from the cockpit. It appears the docking mechanism is actually built into the roof of the cockpit.

3) The Scout Ship has 2 decks (!!!). If you look at the scene where Worf enters the Cockpit, you can see he climbed up a ladder. My thought is that there is a sub-deck below the cockpit where you can store equipment and crew. The back of the ship appears to have plenty of room to fit a bunk or two. Also, the cockpit appears to be rather large, allowing it also to handle crewmembers. As I thought about it, it appeared that the scout ship might actually be the only Fed ship used (with exception of the holoship). This left me with 4 possiblities:

A) The Scout Ship carried all the Duck Blind Officers and Admiral Daughtery to the Briar Patch, where the Son'a Command Ship took over the operation

B) The Scout Ship was assigned to the holoship (since it most likely has a small shuttlebay somehwere), and Daughtery and co. came onboard here

C) The Scout Ship came in a shuttle bay of the Son'a Command Ship. This is possible, since Admiral Doughtery was always on the Son'a Ship. It's possible the Son'a Ship was the only ship there (again, with exception of the holoship)

D) The unknown and unseen "USS Ticonderoga", which was dilly dallying somewhere around, just dropped off Daughtery and co. with the Scout Ship

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey


 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Oh, and I don't think the shuttle has aft torpedo launchers. The Yacht might, but not the shuttle. The ship's fired tachyon bursts, but never torpedoes. Of course, i have no clue where the tachyon bursts came from...

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey


 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Alright, how bout this. The scout ship belongs to the Ticonderoga from which Admiral Dougherty and the Starfleet crew came from. Since it was stated that because of the nature of the Briar Patch ship travel was difficult and not recommended without certain modifications. Instead of modifying the Ticonderoga they came to the Baku planet in the scout ship instead.

------------------
Calvin: "I'm a man of few words."
Hobbes: "Maybe if you read more, you'd have a larger vocabulary."
Federation Starship Datalink - Starship site of the new millennium.
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Hobbes, I like it. Except the Ticonderoga would have to have left the area while the crew were on the surface and before the Enterprise showed up or they would have certainly been involved in the plot.

I don't like the idea that the holoship had a shuttlebay. It's just a box with a bridge and warp nacelles. I don't even think Starfleet has made more than a couple.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I doubt that the "holoship" was built as one. I'd bet it was just a generic Billy-Jo class freighter with a huge hologrid installed in the cargo bay.

------------------
"I wish that everything went just as I wish everything would go."
--
John Linnell
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
And would a freighter manage without a shuttle hangar? The holoship did have planetary landing capacity (at least when empty), so it could load and offload while sitting on the ground. OTOH, sometimes it probably wouldn't be worth landing on a planet to pick up a small amount of cargo when the ship is already heavily laden - and I doubt tansporters are all that good in loading or offloading bulk cargo. It would be nice to have a barge of some sort carried aboard the holoship and related freighter designs...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
The following ships were in the Briar Patch at the beginning:
- The holoship (landed and cloaked): purpose obvious
- The mission scout: It's a fully operational starship, why postulate it has mad the journey in a shuttlebay? The only reasonable possibility is that the scout ship belongs to the USS Ticonderoga (thanks, Hobbes), and the NCC-75227 is the number of the latter ship. Still, the scout is bigger than any shuttle we have seen so far. The most likely purpose: serve as a courier ship between the Briar Patch and the outside world
- Ru'afo's ship: I think it's most likely that this ship accommodated both the Son'a and Starfleet crew.
- The collector ship: purpose obvious

------------------
"Naomi Wildman, sub-unit of Ensign Samantha Wildman, state your intentions." (VOY: "Infinite Regress")
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Sol: I like your explanation that the holoship was not designed as one. If they took an existing freighter design and gutted it to put in the giant holodeck, that is much more satisfying to me than the thought of them designing and building a whole new ship for just this operation or building a whole class of holoships.

Bernd: I agree with you regarding the fully operational nature of the scoutship. My guess is this:
The Son'a arrived outside the Briar Patch in their ships and the Starfleet crew aboard the Ticonderoga (I haven't actually read that this ship was there, but I'll trust whoever posted that it was). Some of the SF crew transferred to the Son'a ship and some to the Scoutship which either came on its own or aboard the Ticonderoga. They go to Bak'u in these two ships and the holoship. The Tic. leaves and is never heard from throught the whole movie.

I also wonder how Data got to the planet. I doubt the Enterprise took him anywhere. It's more likely that he took a shuttle or (to return ever so briefly to the topic) a runabout.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Well the Enterprise-D was able to carry 3 runabouts, and since we know nothing on the Ticonderoga one can assume it's large enough to be able to carry the scout ship.

------------------
Calvin: "I'm a man of few words."
Hobbes: "Maybe if you read more, you'd have a larger vocabulary."
Federation Starship Datalink - Starship site of the new millennium.
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
I have to wonder why Okuda bothered listing the Ticonderoga in the Encylcopedia when it was never seen or heard of in the movie. Was it perhaps in an earlier version of the Insurrection script? Does anyone know how to contact Okuda? He should be able to solve this mystery.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
What if the Ticonderoga, is the holoship (unless the Encyc. says otherwise)

------------------
Quark-"Stop. Or I'll disintigrate this hostage."

20th Century General-"With Your Finger?"

Quark-"With my death ray."

20th Century General-"Looks alot like a finger to me."


 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 

[This message has been edited by Black Knight (edited December 10, 1999).]
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Interesting theory Black Knight, although even if the Encyclopedia doesn't contradict that theory, I'll have trouble believing that until the encyclopedia comes straight out and says, "Ticonderoga, U.S.S. - Starfleet freighter turned into a holoship for use in the Briar Patch". I just think that if this were the case, it's a fairly significant point, and the book should be clear about it.

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
The Ency does contradict the theory because it has a separate entry for the holoship. Why list the holoship separately if it is the Ticonderoga?

The Ency says that "the Ticonderoga reported to the Ba'ku homeworld in 2375 to facilitate the planet becoming a Federation protectorate." This sounds a bit odd to me. The Federation were hardly trying to "protect" the Ba'ku in Insurrection (other than Picard's rebel group). Maybe the Ticonderoga was meant to arrive after the Ent-E left at the end of the movie.

The book "Secrets of ST:Insurrection" has a early sketch of the holoship featuring a more traditional starship look (instead of a box). The thing that grabs my attention is that it has a rego NX-75115. Could this mean that the final holoship has the same rego? It would also mean that the scout can't belong to the holoship.

Anyway, there's my thoughts for the moment.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
In the article in Star Trek: The Magazine, it shows multiple sketches of what the freighter was supposed to be. The 2 sketches that actually look like a starship instead of a brick both have the registry NX-75115.

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey


 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
I like the idea of the Ticonderoga arriving afterwards. That would explain why we never heard from them. I think I'm also going to stick with the theory that the holoship is a converted freighter (not the Ticonderoga).

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 


Posted by Dax (Member # 191) on :
 
The Ticonderoga might have even supplied the Enterprise with a new warp core outside the Patch. After all, it would take absolutely ages for the E to get to a starbase without warp.

It's a shame the Ent-E doesn't have a spare core like Voyager.

------------------
"Forgive me if I don't share your euphoria!" (Weyoun to Dukat, Tears of the Prophets)
Dax's Ships of STAR TREK

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
The novelization seems to use Ticonderoga in that sense: she's supposed to arrive to mop up after the Enterprise has done all the hard work. Then again, the novelization is very different from the actual movie.

I still don't have my video of Insurrection (the 25th
is approaching, though), but I hope it will feature at least some of the scenes cut from the theatrical release. The theater version of the ending was far superior to the original version, though - hooray for preview audiences and last-ditch rewrites!

As for Voyager's spare core: perhaps Intrepids in general are supposed to have one, which is why the MSD has one - but the Voyager specifically does not carry one, explaining the instances where plots hinge on just a single core being available. Perhaps Janeway opted to sail out without one, as delivery was delayed? Or then she had to eject before reaching DS9? In any case, the core should have been lost before "Caretaker", where Janeway chooses to repair the primary core even though this risks the whole ship.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
"Captain, why don't we just use the spare core?"

"We don't have one."

"Why not?"

"It was supposed to arrive... on Tuesday."

------------------
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach him to use the 'net, and he won't bother you for weeks.

[This message has been edited by TSN (edited December 13, 1999).]
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
It's also possible that Voyager no longer has a complete spare.

"Captain, magnetic constrictor segments 3 through 10 are starting to go bad. We can't replicate more."

"Well, take some from the spare warp core."

------------------
"I wish that everything went just as I wish everything would go."
--
John Linnell
 


Posted by Relativity Ironhorse on :
 
Question about the Delta Flyer.
In some of the Voyager episodes, we have seen the cockpit area of the ship. I am not sure if the Ice planet episode where they make it back to the Alpha Quadrant featured Harry Kim in the rear area of the Delta Flyer or not. But my question is does the Delta Flyer only have a cockpit section or it that storage/sleeping area part of the Delta Flyer?

------------------
"Science has a simple faith, which transcends utility. "

Vannevar Bush (1890�1974), U.S. electrical engineer, physicist.


 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Yes, that second part is part of the Delta Flyer. It is also seen in the episodes
very minor $$$


'Thirty Days' Season 5,'Riddlers' in season 6, and 'One Small Step' in season 6. If anyone remembers any others...

------------------
Quark-"Stop. Or I'll disintigrate this hostage."

20th Century General-"With Your Finger?"

Quark-"With my death ray."

20th Century General-"Looks alot like a finger to me."



 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
"Riddles"

Also, Ironhorse, just a thought, but you may get more answers to your question if you post your own thread on the topic in the Starships & Tech section. That way everybody can see it and share their wisdom :-)

------------------
"Resolve and thou art free."
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3