This is topic There are four lights,... I mean nacelles! in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/775.html

Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
Here is the image of the four-nacelled Excelsior study model Mike Okuda was talking about. Thanks to Timo for negotiating with Mike! We have an agreement with Mike. Please *don't use* this image on websites. We might make a nice schematic of it, though :-D
http://www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/articles/wolf359.htm (scroll down for description)
http://www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/articles/wolf359/excelsior-4nacelles.jpg
*** Courtesy of Pocket Books, (c) Paramount ***

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
Is it just me or is the download incredibly slow?

After waiting about 10 minutes and only getting a little bit of the image I closed the window. You might want to check what's up with your server Bernd.

------------------
Sisko: "We run alright, run right at them."
Smiley: "Ah, Pattern Suicide."
Federation Starship Datalink - New and improved Starship Database!

[This message has been edited by Hobbes (edited June 19, 2000).]
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Hm... I think we'll just need to ignore that little "USS EXCELSIOR NCC-2000", eh? *L*

------------------
"How many Libraries of Congress per second can your software handle?"
-Avery Brooks, IBM commercial
 


Posted by Delta Vega (Member # 283) on :
 
Is that what it says on it?
 
Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
I do believe Bernd's server is going to crap. Half the time I try to go to his site in the afternoon, it won't even load.

Back to topic, that ship looks really cool! Though, I don't think is seys NCC-2000. That model is still intact as far as I know.
------------------
"How's your 13th chromosome? Missing a couple of base pairs in gene 178?"--Captain Janeway to Mortimer Harren

The web page is not completed yet, but come by and check it out.
Quantum Threshold

Avalon Sector

[This message has been edited by Black Knight (edited June 19, 2000).]
 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Imagine the direction Federation ship design may have gone if this model were actually used. I think I can already make out some of the parts of the ship. Below that giant bubble (looks almost like a secondary bridge) there is a large opening, possibly the shuttlebay. The ship would probably have been smaller then the Excelsior we know: Look at the size of the bridge. Mabybe if they shortened that "neck", this ship might actually look pretty kewl.

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey

The 359 Webpage



 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
That's not an Excelsior primary hull. It looks more similar to a Constitution II class. It almost looks like a predecessor to the Prometheus Class.

------------------
"Why can't we be friends?'--Smash Mouth

The web page is not completed yet, but come by and check it out. :)
Quantum Threshold

Avalon Sector



 


Posted by Dukhat (Member # 341) on :
 
Well, no matter what anyone thinks the ship looks like, I for one am just happy that our persistence is starting to pay off, first with the Springfield class and now with this model. Hopefully Okuda will present us with even more pics in the near future so we don't have to wait a year for his book.

------------------
Captain Tenille: "Oh, Simpson, you're like the son I never had."
Homer: "And you're like the father I never visit."

 


Posted by Delta Vega (Member # 283) on :
 
Yeah, can anyone make out the registry number or even the name?

------------------
Klingons never do anything small, eh Worf? -Commander Riker,
Star Trek: Insurrection

http://www.huntel.net/massa/StarTrek/index.html



 


Posted by Obese Penguin (Member # 271) on :
 
Im pretty sure its Says USS Excelsior NCC-2000 , Great Job on getting this pic Bernd & Timo , Well in my opinion the design isnt really that good ... Down right ugly. I mean Those modeling guys must have blown their budget pretty quick to peice together a ship with coffee cups... Oh Wait... That Coffee Cup isnt part of the design is it? :p

------------------
Jupiter Station , Starfleet Research & Development



 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Okuda sez the registry is the good old 2000, but the name on this model originally (as finished by the boys at ILM) read "USS Alka-selsior"...

Since Mike said "originally", the name might have been altered later on. In any case, Bernd has convincingly argued that this was probably one of the first Excelsior study models to be built, since it uses the pre-existing Constitution-refit saucer and not the more customized designs seen on the other two known study models. The model with the lenticular hull and traditional secondary hull apparently is the final version before the "production model", while the flat variant might come in between. Interestingly, the four-naceller and the flat ship have the correct saucertop detail while the saucertop of the lenticular-hull ship seems smooth. So the final design really is the best of both worlds...

No, I don't think the coffee cup is an integral part of the ship design (unless it's a tanker of some sort) . But note that nor are the dark diagonal lines on the saucer - that's just the metal wire used to hang the model from the Art Dept office ceiling. This sort of makes the saucer look confusingly like the Miranda class one in the bow-view photo...

Timo Saloniemi

 


Posted by colin (Member # 217) on :
 
The design is interesting.
And this ship's design is canonical for the brief appearances in both episodes.

There appears to be three primary families of starships in Star Fleet, that are at least known: the Galaxy, the Constitution, and the Excelsior.

------------------

takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Very nice design. Needs to be somewhat shorter in the secondary hull for my taste. But it makes a good canon ship, unlike the Freedom and Niagara Class...

The model reminds me of THIS fan-made model.

------------------
"Do you want to be President?"
"Yes."
"Put you hand on the book and say 'I do'."
"I do."
"Good, done. Let's eat!"

- G'kar and Sheridan, Babylon 5.

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited June 20, 2000).]
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
I think the name is "Excelsior", but I'm not sure if that is better than "Alka-selsior".

The server seems to have some difficulties lately, maybe the university is not used to so much traffic

I'm probably moving to a professional provider soon.

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by D-S on :
 
Whats the split on the saucer, or is it string for hanging it from the ceiling?

Nice model
 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
That's a string for hanging it on from the ceiling. That was said in one of the replies above.

------------------
"Do you want to be President?"
"Yes."
"Put you hand on the book and say 'I do'."
"I do."
"Good, done. Let's eat!"

- G'kar and Sheridan, Babylon 5.

[This message has been edited by Altair (edited June 20, 2000).]
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
If it has double torp-launchers I'd say it's a successful successor to the Constellation, but the neck is a bit long! I'd shorten the mid-section so it gets a little more compact! Of course, that's irrelevant if they were only going to use it as a "science"-ship.

------------------
I'm not an atheist, I'm a maybeist�
 


Posted by Starship Freak (Member # 293) on :
 
I think it is a cool ship. I have always favoured ships with more than two nacelles. This design might be a high-speed courier since it looks a bit too fragile for battle.
Is it just me, or does it look like the entire ship is 'retractable'? By that I mean that it looks like one can 'push' the entire midsection into the saucer so that the nacelles comes up to the saucer-edge. Interesting feature if true, something like Voyager�s folding nacelles perhaps? Improved warpfields, that is.

------------------
"The Starships of the Federation are the physical, tangible manifestations of Humanity�s stubborn insistence that life does indeed mean something."
Spock to Leonard McCoy in "Final Frontier"

[This message has been edited by pIn'a' Sov (edited June 20, 2000).]
 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
That would make sense, seeing as where it's supposed ot be a transwarp ship...

------------------
"When you realized that your website is your business and your software can't handle the traffic, that was an epiphany."
-Avery Brooks, IBM commercial
 


Posted by Black Knight (Member # 134) on :
 
Here is the picture on a slightly faster server.
4 Nacelled Excelsior

And here it is with a shortened body

I also took the liberty of extending the nacelles just a tad.
------------------
"Why can't we be friends?'--Smash Mouth

The web page is not completed yet, but come by and check it out.
Quantum Threshold

Avalon Sector


[This message has been edited by Black Knight (edited June 20, 2000).]
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
Bravo!

------------------
Ready for the action now, Dangerboy
Ready if I'm ready for you, Dangerboy
Ready if I want it now, Dangerboy?
How dare you, dare you, Dangerboy?
How dare you, Dangerboy?
I dare you, dare you, Dangerboy...

�on Flux, "Thanatophobia"

 


Posted by Fructose (Member # 309) on :
 
I kinda like the shorter one myself. Looks more starfleetish.

------------------
It doesn't matter if you don't know what you're doing as long as you look good doing it.


 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
Wow, I really like this ship now. Anyone care to guess what that giant bubble is? Maybe it's part of the transwarp core.

------------------
"The things hollow--it goes on forever--and--oh my God!--it's full of stars!" -David Bowman's last transmission back to Earth, 2001: A Space Odyssey

The 359 Webpage



 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Transwarp core?

------------------
It's not my birthday
It's not today
It's not my birthday so why do you lunge out at me?
--
They Might Be Giants
****
Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! I'll give you a cookie.


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
Weird that to this point no-one has mentioned that the ship seen on screen has the top 2 and bottom 2 nacelles closer to the middle. Like the Prometheus the distance between top and bottom nacelles is clearly shorter than between the left and right nacelles.

But the model shows an almost square configuration.

------------------
"Do you want to be President?"
"Yes."
"Put you hand on the book and say 'I do'."
"I do."
"Good, done. Let's eat!"

- G'kar and Sheridan, Babylon 5.

 


Posted by Alpha Centauri (Member # 338) on :
 
Black Knight: I hope for you that Okuda doesn't get to seen that pic on *your* website... Goodbye agreement!

------------------
"Alpha Centauri is a beautiful place to visit, you ought to see it" - Kirk to 1969 USAF officer Fellini, "Tomorrow is Yesterday" (TOS)
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
One could always chalk some of this up to battle damage and bent pylons

Seriously, I think the arrangement is still square for the picture on the left - the ship is simply seen from an angle that distorts the image. Note how confusingly the port side of the saucer lurks in the shadows - it's difficult to even tell where the bow is pointing.

As for the picture on the right... Hands up, those who can as much as SEE the lower pylon pair! There's no question, though, that the model is the same, even if we don't see much of it.

And the ship is probably the same, too... Qualor II could be the final resting place of the Wolf 359 ships. At least the proto-Nebula is identical (two ships could not have received identical battle damage, now could they?). We know that Qualor II is near the Romulan Neutral Zone and Galorndon Core - and we also have reason to believe that the RNZ is relatively close to Earth, and thus to Wolf 359. Perhaps it was chosen as a surplus depot back in the days of the Romulan war, close to the front lines, and has been accumulating ships ever since.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
Can I just say... WOW! I've been on exams, and so haven't been around as much and look at what I come back to! Lovely. Thanks Mike Okuda! WOW!

I think its a pretty ship. I don't think its a warship but rather an exploration ship... long term

Oh and AT LAST another ship that has Oberthesque nacelles!

I could just see a beauty pass of this ship as you first see the the saucer and then as it passes over you in front of a beautiful cobalt blue nebula... its neck and then its nacelles... WOOSH!

*looks around*

huh hmmmmm

Anyway thanks Bernd thanks Mike.

Andrew

------------------
"chocolate cherries allamanda" - Datura, Tori Amos

 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Hey, pIn'a'Sov and Black Knight, I'm beginning to think you have something there. The ship certainly does look like it was specifically designed to be "retractable" - the supposed shuttlebay is just a cavity to retract the aft hull ridge into (that photo rendering is pretty convincing). Probably one of the gimmicks that would have told the ship apart from the old Enterprise. Never mind that the feature makes most of the saucer interior useless - perhaps this ship was only intended to be a testbed without any mission gear.

But there could be further variable geometry built into the model as well. Just look how the pylons are mounted to the aft hull - lots of open space as if to allow for movement. Perhaps the nacelle pairs can move closer to each other from that perfect cruciform arrangement in certain flight modes?

In fact, the nacelle shape suggests that perhaps the upper ones were intended to fit perfectly against the lower ones, creating a hemispherical forward end where now there are 1/8-spherical endcaps. The mounting of the pylons on the nacelles does not exactly support this kind of extreme variable geometry, since there are no cutouts in the inner walls for fully horizontal pylons - but perhaps BG intended to introduce them to the final version, were it to be built to these specs.

I must ask Okuda if he can perform a little experimentation with the ship. And when it is ruined beyond repair, you can all come and stab me if you can find your way to Finl... I mean, Madagaskar. I just recently moved. Boy, it's hot in Tananarive.

If this ship really is variable-geometry, then it probably was not intended for operational use at all. Perhaps it was a simple VG experiment predating Intrepid, or perhaps an early transwarp testbed that paved the way for the real NX-2000...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
This is a bit off topic, but, Timo and Bernd, have you thanked Okuda on behalf of everyone on the Forums? I mean, this is really very, very nice of him.

------------------
It's not my birthday
It's not today
It's not my birthday so why do you lunge out at me?
--
They Might Be Giants
****
Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! I'll give you a cookie.


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I have been trying to insert suitable thanks from me and Flare Forum and the fandom collectively to every message...

Speaking of which, Okuda agrees in the latest reply that the model seems as if it could telescope, but apparently this feature was never really built into the study model. Nor do the pylons actually swing in the current model. An actual photographic model, if built to these specs, would probably have had a fully telescoping body and swinging, articulated nacelles.

Interestingly enough, the nacelles have broken off and been re-glued to a different position several times. The most recent accident was after the filming of "BoBW", so it seems safe to assume that the nacelles were arranged differently during that episode, just as the screencaps show.

Timo Saloniemi
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3