This is topic Recent Fact Files - starship stuff.... in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/791.html

Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Fact Files 179 and 180 have had a chart of Starfleet vessels. You can see the comparison silhouette chart at http://steve.pugh.net/fleet/images/ff_chart.gif

There were also spreads of full colour images (starboard views) and brief notes. The first two spreads did all the ships down to Miranda in size and listed a length. The dodgy lengths from the DS9 TM were used so the Miranda is too big and the Sabre is way too big.

The last two spreads didn't list lengths. The Constellation is also too small. I have no idea where they got that size for the Steamrunner from.

The Tug, see http://steve.pugh.net/fleet/images/ff_tug.gif seems to be a new ship. Where's it from? The big arms seem to rule out the tug from 'A Time to Stand'. I've only seen up to the end of season 6 DS9 and most of season 5 Voyager, so does this come from a later show (maybe the UP scenes in that time travelling Voyager episode)?

Also, how well do the sizes of the Niagara and Freedom match with the current analysis that some of you folks are doing? Ditto the relative sizes of the Attack Fighter, Danube and Scoutship?


------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--

[This message has been edited by Identity Crisis (edited July 03, 2000).]
 


Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :
 
That Sabre-Class CANNOT be right. From all we've seen from FC and SoA, it's about a fourth longer than the Defiant. Otherwise it's a great chart.

------------------
Ready for the action now, Dangerboy
Ready if I'm ready for you, Dangerboy
Ready if I want it now, Dangerboy?
How dare you, dare you, Dangerboy?
How dare you, Dangerboy?
I dare you, dare you, Dangerboy...

�on Flux, "Thanatophobia"

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited July 03, 2000).]
 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Of course the Sabre isn't right. It uses the dimensions from the DS9 TM, which as we all know is full or errors. In this case the TM proofreaders failed to notice that the Sabre stats were a cut and paste from the Norway.

As I pointed out the Miranda/Soyuz is also too large and the Constellation too small.

In fact, the Constitution refit is also too small, as the Fact File authors made both Cosntitutions 289m long rather than making the refit 305m as it should be.

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
The only thing I can think of for the Tug Class is that little Klingon-looking thing seen towing the Fredrickson at the beginning of the ep where we first saw the Shelley Class. It was the season 6 premiere I think.

Of course if I had been paying attention, I'd have realized that that was the ship you were talking about from ATTS. I still think that's what it's supposed to be though.

------------------
"A gathering of Angels appeared above my head. They sang to me this song of hope, and this is what they said..." -Styx

Aban's Illustration www.thespeakeasy.com/alanfore


[This message has been edited by Aban Rune (edited July 03, 2000).]
 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Yeah, I took another look at it. The nacelles and nacelle supports match fairly well. And it's possible that the on screen ship had those arms folded up in a more compact position. If only the Fact Files would give a top or forward view we'd be able to tell. Or have they already done that and I've missed it?

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Michael Dracon (Member # 4) on :
 
WHOA!! The Steamrunner is WAY to small...

------------------
"Do you want to be President?"
"Yes."
"Put you hand on the book and say 'I do'."
"I do."
"Good, done. Let's eat!"

- G'kar and Sheridan, Babylon 5.

 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I was sure there were some images of the tug at Pedro's, but I can't seem to find them.

At any rate, there weren't any new ships featured in "Relativity", at least that anyone has been able to spot. I'm presuming that the Fact Files say that this is indeed a Federation vessel? Hmm. The Time to Stand tug seems to be the only ship that fits. It would appear that the idea of that tug being Klingon is not universally shared.

------------------
But the dead only quickly decay. They don't go about being born and reborn and rising and falling like souffle. The dead only quickly decay.
--
Gothic Archies
****
Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! For the love of God, Montressor!

 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Well, in comparison to the Miranda, the Freedom and Niagara are approximately right. However, the Nia should be slightly longer than the Fre (not the other way around, as shown).

But, then, that's assuming that both diagrams are accurate, and that they have normal GCS nacelles. Both of which cases, at least for the Nia, we now know to be untrue. So basically, we don't know the lengths anymore.

Did anyone else notice that their diagram of the Soyuz is missing the bottom section of the added-on stuff?

------------------
"I'm sick of you little girl and boy groups: all you do is annoy me, so I have been sent here to destroy you..."
-Eminem, "The Real Slim Shady"
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Hmm...oddly enough, they have the Excelsior II there, and the Akira, Saber, Steamrunner, Defiant, and Sydney all look like they have incorrect sizes. You'd think the person doing the diagram would have noticed the Saber/Norway thing...

------------------
June is National Accordion Awareness Month.
"People are buried however they choose to be, apparently. Unless you've never written your will, in which case your body is shipped to Meltakron V and reanimated to serve as a robot in their yttrium mines." - Simon Sizer
 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
I already have the tug pic a couple of days, but I didn't want to scare anyone. Okay, so I'll have to accept it eventually.

The ship chart is simply ridiculous. It shows how the same old errors (Sabre, Sydney) are reproduced again and again, and new ones (Niagara, Constellation) added.

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Brown_supahero (Member # 83) on :
 
The TUG Did this really came from FF.
Which way is front? Is there gonna be a proper name for this class
How many people accept this image?
If Bernd will accept this I will
 
Posted by Dat (Member # 302) on :
 
I will never accept the tug as Federation or Starfleet unless TPTB say it is. It looks WAY TOO Klingon to me. Some people just have to say it's Fed or Starfleet because it appeared with a Starfleet fleet. They're wrong. That fleet also had Klingon BOPs.

And almost all drawings of the Soyuz out there are incorrect. The Soyuz has a rounded bridge (early ST II TV series refit Enterprise), 4 sensor pods (1 dorsal, 1 ventral, 1 port, 1 starboard), an extra deck or two that's been added to the lower saucer right above the lower sensor dome, and spikes that stick out forward from that/those deck(s).

------------------
7 alarm clock: "Do not touch me."
Dilbert: "Then how do I turn you off?"
7: "Believe me, I am plenty turned off."
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
*makes the prerequiste comment on the attack fighter*

Although it's kinda hard to make out on the chart, I'd say it's still a bit small. It should be about 35m long, its more like 25 in the diagram.

------------------
"Truth about Santa Claus debunks Santa God. God evolves from Santa."
-Gene Ray, http://www.timecube.com



 


Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
Nobody is perfect.

------------------
"No matter where you go, there you are."


 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Using the Wolf 359 comparison chart from Bernd's site I get lengths for the Freedom and Niagara in the 450m region whereas this chart puts them in the 260m region. Is this in line with current thinking?

The Tug, right is forwards. No proper class name given. As every other pic on the chart has appeared elsewhere in the FF over the years I'm guessing that the Tug will be detailed in an issue coming soon(-ish).

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
As long as we don't have a close-up on the Freedom, I must say I like the idea of it being only 260-270m long. This would make it the 24th century successor to the Saladin/Hermes line, and the nacelle would be roughly in scale with the New Orleans nacelle of similar shape. And I would be VERY happy if Niagara could be considered this small, too - but the window count seems to rule that out.

Here's hoping the Fact Files don't corrupt too many young minds with that chart. Thankfully, it isn't graphically stunning or anything. Perhaps it would best be used for practicing the art of silhouette-cutting?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by D-S on :
 
The FF gave got it wrong again, It aint a TUG it's [as everyone should know] The Standard issue Federation tin opener!

The pic of the Saber is wrong the lower hull should come below the nacelles
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
The TUG *has* got Intrepid impulse engines...

------------------
FuckU-FuckMe: Changing the feel of communication:
"What kinds of security controls does FuckU-FuckMe offer?

All FuckU-FuckMe users can control whom they connect to on an individual basis. There's no need to go to a public reflector. "

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prakesh's Star Trek Site



 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
And the Vor'Cha *has* got Galaxy ramscoops.

Industrial espionage or amicable technology exchange?

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Or just surface similarity.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Canadian bacon is called that because it's made from Canadians. And while I'm on the subject, could you people cut back on the fish and rodents and eat more fruits and berries? It would vastly improve your flavor, in my opinion." - Simon Sizer
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I only recently realized that the tug is supposed to be facing left in the picture - those big arms are dangling behind it (or then the thing is moving on reverse in "A Time to Stand"). That would mean the Intrepid engines are some sort of braking thrusters...

Anyway, since kitbashers freely intermingle parts from the ships of various races, I won't accept this as a Fed design until I see Starfleet insignia or Latin text on it. OTOH, I won't really accept it as Klingon until I see their cuneiform on it, either...

Umm, what if this is Dominion war loot, and the Frederickson is actually PUSHING it home?

Timo Saloniemi

 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
Every other ship on the Fact Files charts is facing RIGHT, so why should this one be facing LEFT? What led you to that conclusion, Timo?

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Bernd (Member # 6) on :
 
The Niagara size in the FF chart is definitely much too small. There is no way to disregard the window sizes.

If the FF diagram of the Freedom alone is correct, then the deck heights in the saucer roughly correspond with the size of a 1/1 scale Galaxy nacelle - exactly as on the Niagara model which was also built by Greg Jein. The only problems are the tall windows in the neck. I'm inclined to say this is the FF is wrong with that. I can't imagine that Greg Jein made such errors on a custom-built model.

I would like to make the Freedom smaller too, but it seems more likely that the ship is actually 430m.

------------------
"Species 5618, human. Warp-capable, origin grid 325, physiology inefficient, below average cranium capacity, minimum redundant systems, limited regenerative abilities."
Ex Astris Scientia
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
The orientation of the tug comes, very simply, from the relevant "A Time to Stand" scene. It's easy to see that the angular ends of the nacelles point towards the viewer (and glow red), and the canted leading edges of the "pylons" are also a giveaway - their upper ends are farther away from the viewer than the lower ends.

The overall coloration on screen (as opposed to in the picture) still strikes me as Klingon - and the red lines on the flanks in the pic do not appear to be decorative Starfleet streamers, but pieces of machinery (which doesn't even glow red in the episode).

I wonder if the thing is manned? It's big enough to have habitable spaces, but there are no obvious windows or accessways.

Don't the cylindrar bow and stern fixtures (with the harpoon-like things in the aft fixture) look like some sort of docking adapters that could fit into each other? Perhaps there's a matching fixture in a typical starship. Heck, most Klingon starships do have round holes of this apparent diameter - never mind that they are torp tubes, they may also be towing fixtures.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Identity Crisis (Member # 67) on :
 
I guess it does fit the screenshots better that way round. Another goof for the FF.

torp tubes, towing fixtures and of course doccking ports (many shots of BoPs docked to DS9 nose first).

------------------
-->Identity Crisis<--


 


Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :
 
You know what, those look like Romulan nacelles on that thing...

------------------
"Huh. An intelligent guard. I never would have guessed."
-Stith, Titan A.E.
 


Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
The modeler strikes again...so far I've idenitified 5 pieces of the tug:

--the Romulan warbird nacelles;
--the Intrepid-class outer pylon wing;
--the Danube-class sensor rollbar (look on the top);
--legs from an Imperial AT-ST (the arms);
--at least one of the clips used to hold a motherboard to its case (the "prongs" all the way to the right)

------------------
"Do you know how much YOU'RE worth??.....2.5 million Woolongs. THAT'S your bounty. I SAID you were small fry..." --Spike Spiegel
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3