Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
Bill Clinton Monument Fundraiser
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Siegfried: [QB] Hmmm... Let's see here. Which is the worse crime? Getting a blow job in the Oval Office or giving two planeloads of Stinger missles to Iranian terrorists? Ask a Republican, they'll either go with the blow job or claim, as Omega does, that Iran-Contra never happened. Let's take a look at Bill Clinton's charge. He received oral gratification from a White House intern. In deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit, he says that he did not have a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Well, to the best of my knowledge, there is no law or legal precedent explaining what constitutes sexual relations. In my mind, oral sex is a form of sexual intimacy. In the minds of several of my friends (and apparently President Clinton), oral sex is not "sexual relations." Of course, should any of these events happened? No. Republicans were so eager to dig up anything on Clinton, that individuals such as Richard Scaife and organizations such as Rutherford Institute and media outlets such as American Spector paid people for even the slightest rumor. That's how we got Whitewater and Paula Jones and the unbelievable transmutation that connected A to B. That's how we also got unfounded allegations like Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddick and the alleged 13 year-old love child he had with a prostitue. Essentially, we the people of the United States had to endure a witch-hunt at a cost of $80 million that yeilded nothing on Bill Clinton and an approx 500 page porno novel written by "Hard-On" Kenny Starr. Let's take a look at Ronald Reagan. Republicans desperately wanted control of White House back from Jimmy Carter. So, they struck a deal with the Iranian terrorists holding 44 American hostages. This can be corroborated by the evidence supporting a negotiation in Paris in October 1980 between George H. W. Bush and leaders of the Islamic Jihad. The Iranians would release the hostages in exchange for two planeloads of Stinger missles. Bush claims this didn't happen and has proof. His proof are logs that say he away giving a speech (a speech which actually occurred several days after when the log indicated). Officials of Iran at that time, including a Sadir Afar now living in France, are offering to give the US proof that this meeting did take place. The last time it was offered was during the Clinton Impeachment Fiasco. After Reagan won the presidency, the Iranians got their missles and Americans got their hostages. And numerous laws were broken, more than in the case of Clinton's penis. The Senate began hearing with Lawrence Walsh as the Independent Counsel. Reagan testified numerous times that he "cannot recall" any of the alleged activities. Either he was lying or he was so ineffective a leader that he did not notice his aides involved in illegal activities or that he was so unrespected that his subordinates thought nothing more of potentially tarnishing his presidency. All three options are unappealing. You cannot claim that Iran-Contra did not happen because it did. The Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah got their hands on sophisticated US Stinger missles. High ranking members of the government were implicated in the deal and cover-up. Among them was Casper Weinberger. Walsh was close to indicting Weinberger on numerous charges in the summer of 1992. In October 1992, Weinberger held a press conference where he said that he would not go to jail to protect the more guilty individuals. Shortly afterwards, Clinton won the '92 election and Bush pardonned six officials involved in Iran-Contra on Christmas Eve '92. One of the six was Weinberger. With this, the Democrats (in a foolish maneuver) closed down the Iran-Contra hearings and ended Walsh's investigation. In short, Republicans like First of Two and Omega can slam Bill Clinton all they want. They resort to rumors and half-truths and elevate them actual facts and proof of wrong-doing. At the same time, they ignore evidence of actual wrong-doing and devastation to the US national security on the part of Reagan, Bush the Smarter, Weinberger, and others. The Republicans frequently enjoy casting stones when they themselves are not without sin. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3