Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Starfleet NCO Ranks
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by akb1979: [QB] Oh yeah . . . [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb]That's some serious research, and would seem to match the canon data very well. Also, I see little reason to bump a Bajoran General down to the level of a Starfleet Fleet Captain - Generals should be flag officers (Admirals in Starfleet parlance) in all the naming systems.[/qb][/QUOTE] Yep, some serious research and yeah, the Bajoran General is way too low. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb]The Romulan system looks all right to me, based on what precious little we know of it so far. One could, however, insert the putative rank of Sub-centurion there as well, and thus fill the gaps in comparison with Starfleet ranks (Centurion=Lt.Cmdr, Sub-centurion =Lt).[/qb][/QUOTE] Naw - too many "subs" then. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb]The Cardassian system could be more complex than shown, for the simple reason that . . .[/qb][/QUOTE] Mmm, I had originally thought that there were only two ranks - Gul and Glinn. Could be weong. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb]The Klingon system is of course a total mess (not because you'd have messed it up, but because Paramount did).[/qb][/QUOTE] :D Can't and won't argue with ya there! Sorry for dragging this old thread but I was doing some more research and remembered this - a real bugger to find in all of these threads - perhaps a mini search engine could be created to make searching for topics a little easier? Just a thought . . . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3