Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
The Animated Series: why non-canon?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bond, James Bond: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Bond, James Bond: [qb]I'm well aware of the non-canon status of TAS at Paramount. I was offering my opinion. Or are those not allowed either? [/qb][/QUOTE]You can't offer an opinion over what is "canon" or not, in the same way that I cannot offer an opinion over what elements water is made up of. Canon is strictly defined. It is not open to opinion. [/qb][/QUOTE]Paramount can never alter the conditions of what is and is not canon? I seem to remember a couple of Jeri Taylor novels ("Pathways" and "Mosaic") that were considered canon (at least until they were partially contradicted by later Voyager episodes). My point was that Paramount can set guidleines as to what information from TAS is canon or not, and not leave it up to individual writers to include what aspects of it they would like to see. It doesn't always have to appear onscreen in a live action series or movie to be considered canon nor does everything seen onscreen become canon automatically because it can be declared non-canon by the Executive Producer. Paramount and the Executive Producer are the final authorities on what is canon or not. I was suggesting they should alter the rules to allow aspects of TAS that they deem acceptable. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3