Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
ST Chronology Question
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Harry: [QB] Yep. Icheb said Kirk's mission ended in 2270. BTW, TAS season 2 is only 6 episodes, and doesn't really deserve to be in a different year. TAS 1+2 is still only 23 episodes. This has been done thousands of times, but I've drawn yet another timeline: [IMG]http://flareupload.pleh.net/uploads/265/tos-timeline.png[/IMG] - Okuda's basic underlying premise seems to be the production month + 300 years. - He further places WNMHGB 'six months to a year' earlier than the first 'proper' season one episode (which is placed in September 2266). - He then claims (for seemingly no reason at all) that WNMHGB was 13 months, 12 days into the mission, as per some obscure stardate-system. This is by far the biggest anomaly in his TOS-dating. That explains the red bars. If you fit five full years over that system, you get the green bars. The green timeline works well for the non-TAS universe, and before some Voyager writer introduced the 2270 date. The blue timeline is my conjectural timeline. I've adhered to the basic 300 years assumption, but have removed the silly 2264 dates and added another year for TAS. As for TMP.. even in Okuda's system, the 'two and a half years' statement only works if TMP takes place at the very end of 2271. I'd much rather put TMP somewhere in 2273. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3