Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
TNG "Legacy" speculations
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by FawnDoo: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sol System: [qb]But anyway the investigation wouldn't count against him, or rather wouldn't count against him any more than losing a ship in the first place did. [/qb][/QUOTE]I think you're right - the court martial cleared him of any wrongdoing, but he still lost the ship and I think that would stay in the minds of people at command for a while. This might account for his 8 year gap between [i]Stargazer[/i] and [i]Enterprise[/i]: perhaps he was working his way back up the list of Captains until he was assigned a ship again? We have seen evidence that Starfleet keeps a close eye on its personnel and can even "blacklist" someone and essentially bar them from ever getting a command of their own: doesn't Sisko inform Worf of something to that effect after he destroyed a decloaking Klingon transport full of civilians? (for once the "episode title" circuit in my brain has failed me, sorry) I am sure there is a line in that episode that runs along the lines of "Basically this means you'll not have a command of your own in the future." Okay so Picard wasn't barred, but maybe he had to work a little after the loss of his ship...get back a little trust, a little backing from Starfleet Command? What do you think? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3