Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Star Trek: The Next Regeneration
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Reverend: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [qb] Sorry to be a wet blanket, but I see nothing in that clip that's any better or more convincing than the original VFX. But then, I'm sure everyone's aware of my well-recorded views on the [i]Star Wars[/i] special editions and the director's edition of TMP. Rubbish. Vintage films/TV shows with CGI effects = CRAP. Period. Full stop. -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/qb][/QUOTE]I'm sure if you did a side by side comparison with the original footage the improvement would become more evident. It seams the same because whomever did this was being very faithful to the original camera angles, compositions and even the pans. Of course none of this improves the story telling, just makes the reactions to what's on the viewscreen a little more credible. As far as those examples you mentioned, I'd say that both had a limited ammount of success. The Star Wars Special Editions were a little over cooked, apparantly old George developed a thing for slapstick at the time, as evidenced by a certain unamable charater from episode one. As far as TMS:SE, I though that was lagely successful, the only let down was that in places the new effects quite obviously had bugetary restrictions (same goes for Red Dwarf.) However, at least they made a consious effort to match up the style to the original footage. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3