Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
$$ Consequences of the movie on the original Trek universe [Spoilers]
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Guardian 2000: [qb]1. Romulans from the Prime timeline have had ridges since at least the 2100s. (And tattoos have never been observed as a Romulan normal trait, even among the civilians.) Nero and the gang do not have ridges. Ergo they are not our Romulans.[/qb][/QUOTE]Not in TOS they didn't, and Spock was never characterized as looking out of place on Romulus, so either there are both kinds or we're just supposed to ingnore the issue as an artistic device and not an in-universe fact. [QUOTE][b]Even in the Supernova timeline, they give stardates just like they do in BH 2233, a modified timeline.[/QUOTE][/b] So at some point between 2379 and the 2380s they went back to an older system of stardates. We've already seen them change dating conventions twice before. [QUOTE][b]Supernova Spock says Scotty discovered transwarp beaming. Our Scotty never did that.[/b][/QUOTE]Why do you say that? We have no idea what Scotty did or didn't do after we last saw him in "Relics" (TNG). [QUOTE][b]As soon as Nero fell in, the timeline ought to have changed.[/QUOTE][/b] No, it would have changed when he [i]came out[/i], which according to Spock was "minutes" later. Besides, they aren't using the "one timeline" theory any more, but rather the "many timelines" theory. For all we know, all our previous observations about how time travel works have been wrong. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3