Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
$$$For all the continuity hounds...$$$
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kazeite: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Malnurtured Snay: [qb]Disasterous could also mean "Whoops we left our advanced tech there and now they're about a century further ahead on the industrial development stage than they should be."[/qb][/QUOTE]I don't think so. I mean, "disasterous" definition is pretty clear (heh, I starting to sound like Guardian 2000 :D ) I agree that your both examples can qualify as pretty darn bad things, but not extremaly bad or terrible, as in 'disasterous'. What was so bad in FC with Klingons that could cause it to be used as an example 200 years later? If anything, it could be only used as an example of [b]good[/b] First Contact, slightly messed up at the beginning, but then smoothed over and carried to the triumphant end. (BTW, has anyone of you had the chance to read [i]Broken Bow[/i] novelisation? In this particular scene Klaangs only worry was that he would be shot [i]in the back[/i] by Sulibans and considered cowardly (he also wonders if he can run backwards. No, really) So when Moore shoots him he's almost grateful, because he shoots him in the front.) Also note, that althought I don't like early Klingons too, this doesn't technically count as continuity violation, unfortunately. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3