Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
$$$For all the continuity hounds...$$$
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] Assumptions needed to make Picard's words compatible with ENT: Set A: -Within at most a few years of the 2151 Klingon FC, a real "disaster" does result (and ENT better show this to us!). -This "disaster" involves major loss of life, outbreak of war, things of that nature - just losing NX-01 will not count... -This "disaster" is a direct consequence of the FC, and would not have happened had the FC been handled the way Picard handles the Malcorians. Set B: -Picard refers to a FC other than the 2151 one, perhaps the Vulcan/Klingon one at some earlier date. -Again, the "disaster" is a big one, but this time we need not see it happening in ENT, as it has already happened before the show began. The "decades of hostilities" Picard mentions will no doubt refer to the ca. 2218-2293 timeframe here, as well as in set A. -Again, the "disaster" could have been avoided had PD protocols been in place. So basically, any subtle hint that the Vulcans pissed off the Klingons in the past would be all that we need. Picard need not be considered a human chauvinist (even if he doth quote Shakespeare to that effect), and he would certainly bunch up the Vulcans into his first person plural if it served his purpose with the Malcorians. Of course, I'd be happier if ENT did a whole episode based on this putative Vulcan mistake. Yet I could live even if ENT never even mentions that the Vulcans soured up things with the Klingons - after all, the Vulcans in the show could have a reason to stay mum about the blunder. Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3