Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Dominion Battlecruiser Sizes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The_Tom: [QB] For those of you who thought four was too many... I was reviewing Saba's videos from SofA, and had a good long look at the final ship the Defiant passes over... the damn big one that's a squeeze to squish into the 630-730 meter size bracket... and lo and behold... I think we have yet [i]another[/i] Battlecruiser design. Nearly identical from the back, but from the front you can make out quite a few differences [*]A very big bird-chest sticking downwards [*]A sort of modular segmentation on the madible not seen in the <a href=http://kcohn.simplenet.com/alidarjarok/deepspace9/sacrificeofangels/Angel26.jpg>other battlecruisers</a> [*]Thin, nearly 45% pylons holding up the upper nacelle-things that are far less snug to the ship than in the V-ship and standard battlecruiser. [*]Two big central ridges that start about 2/3 of the way from the bow to the "poop deck" and no visible ridging in front of that. [*]Overall size... I think 850+ m is more reasonable. Now have I cracked yet another great secret of ship scaling or should I lay off the LSD? BTW, the only <a href=http://www.shiporama.org/images/fleet/battle31.jpg>image</a> Pedro had doesn't really show off the features I was talking about too well... they appear several frames later, often lit by the light of the explosion. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3