Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Galaxy Class not the first Galaxy Class ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] Well, it's not as if Roddenberry would have refused to use the name Galaxy class for the E-D just because he once happened to write (co-write?) some stuff that featured a Galaxy class already. Roddenberry was probably the person least concerned with continuity in the entire Star Trek staff. Put him and Dixon in the same room and be assured that only one of them will step out, raving "I had to do it - can you BELIEVE this guy?!"... The novelizations of the TOS movies don't seem to be of very high quality in general. The TNG ones more or less reproduce the early versions of the scripts without adding much, but the TOS ones seem to "flesh out" weird details and leave the main story and character interaction rather thin. I guess I'm biased because I have actually seen the TOS movies before I read the novelizations, while it's vice versa for the TNG stuff. Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3