Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
since when was voyager said to be a warship?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nimrod: [QB] And my point is that Defiant is the manifestation of Starfleet hypocrisy. The escort label was a bureaucratic attempt at staying kosher, they shouldn't even have tried to cover it. (Can I say [i]kosher[/i] even if I'm not jewish? Or is that wrong to jews? I honestly don't know, please tell me) When Kira said she thought Starfleet didn't believe in them, Sisko should've said "Well times change. We have to defend ourselves against the borg and the dominion." or something. At least he would've been honest, because they really needed warships. When they don't, just dismantle them, it would be even greater cause for celebration. Besides, it doesn't matter what Starfleet calls their ships if the other powers don't recognize the classifications, like Kruge's gunner in ST:III, when identifying the Enterprise. I understand and respect the wish not to support war, but Starfleet ships are already powerful enough to function as war ships. Putting families on board and holosuites and steam baths is just details. Look what Captain Maxwell did to the cardassians... "No, that was no warship, just an explorer vessel with guns that can level a city in seconds!" Or if a romulan ship would be ambushed by 10 rogue Nova class ships, would the romulans say "We are being attacked by ten starfleet science vessels with mediocre armament!!!" I'd bet more on fast scouts... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3